Policy Watch The Food Stamp Program and Welfare Reform
|
|
- Egbert Hamilton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of Economic Perspectives Volume 10, Number 2 Spring 1996 Pages Policy Watch The Food Stamp Program and Welfare Reform Betsey A. Kuhn, Pamela Allen Dunn, David Smallwood, Kenneth Hanson, Jim Blaylock, and Stephen Vogel Public policies are often made without much recourse to economic reasoning. Economists are often unaware of what is happening in the world of public affairs. As a result, both the quality of public decision making and the role that economists play in it are less than optimal. This feature contains short articles on topics that are currently on the agendas of policymakers, thus illustrating the role of economic analysis in illuminating current debates. Suggestions for future columns and comments on past ones should be sent to Daniel Weinberg, c/o Journal of Economic Perspectives, HHES Division, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C Introduction to the Food Stamp Program Food stamps are intended to help low-income families and individuals meet their basic nutritional needs by ensuring they have the means to purchase a nutritionally adequate and palatable low-cost diet. Major changes have been proposed for this program, including how much should be spent and whether the payments should be converted to block grants to increase state flexibility. This article will Betsey A. Kuhn is Acting Director, Food and Consumer Economics Division; Pamela Allen Dunn is a Visiting Scholar from the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland; David Smallwood is Acting Chief of the Food Consumption, Nutrition, and Assistance Branch; Kenneth Hanson is Economist, Rural Economy Division; Jim Blaylock is Acting Associate Director, Food and Consumer Economics Division; and Stephen Vogel is Economist, Rural Economy Division. All authors are at the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
2 190 Journal of Economic Perspectives explore the impacts of food stamp reform on food spending, income support, welfare reform, the agricultural sectors and the rest of the economy. The Food Stamp Program is the largest noncategorical federal welfare program, serving approximately 27 million people a month including 14 million children and costing more than $24 billion in Some basic characteristics of the program and of households receiving this assistance are presented in Table 1. In particular, most of the money spent on food stamps is federal. Benefits under the Food Stamp Program are entirely federally funded, while the costs of program administration are shared by federal, state and local governments. The number of individuals participating in the Food Stamp Program rises and falls at about the same rate as the number of people living in poverty (Kinsey and Smallwood, 1994). To be eligible for food stamps, households must meet both asset and income tests. 1 All households may have up to $2,000 of countable resources, such as bank accounts; $3,000, if at least one household member is age 60 or older. Income tests require that gross monthly income be at or below 130 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines and net monthly income be at or below 100 percent of the guidelines. Households with an elderly or disabled member are exempt from the gross income test. Net income is computed by subtracting the following deductions from the sum of earned and unearned income: a standard deduction available to all households, an earned income deduction, a medical expense deduction limited to the elderly and disabled, a shelter expense deduction and a dependent-care deduction for households engaged in work or training. Food stamp benefit levels assume that households participating in the program devote about 30 percent of their net income to food purchases. In fact, the lowest income quintile actually spends about one-third of its income on food, compared to under 10 percent for the highest income quintile (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1995a). The difference between the household's expected contribution to its food costs and an amount judged to be sufficient to buy an adequate low-cost diet is provided as food stamp coupons. This maximum food stamp benefit level is derived from the Thrifty Food Plan, the lowest cost of four plans designed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The maximum benefit amount varies by household size and is adjusted annually for changes in the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan. In 1995, singleperson households were eligible for a maximum of $115 worth of coupons a month, and a family of eight for a monthly maximum of $695 in coupons. The first U.S. food assistance programs were established during the depression of the 1930s. The government purchased surplus agricultural commodities and distributed them to the poor, with the goal of stabilizing farm prices and incomes. Not until the 1960s did food aid programs begin to focus on the food and nutritional needs of society independent from the support of farm programs. The Food 1 The Food Stamp Program defines a recipient household as one in which all members of the household customarily purchase and prepare their meals together. This definition does not necessarily include all the individuals who live together in a single dwelling unit, and it is a broader definition than that used by Aid to Families with Dependent Children and Supplemental Security Income.
3 Betsey A. Kuhn et al. 191 Table 1 Program and Participant Information for the Food Stamp Program Stamp Act of 1964 established the first coupon-based system allowing participants to buy a wide variety of food with coupons rather than restricting their consumption to surplus commodities. Participants had to purchase food stamp coupons for an amount based on income and household size. In doing so, participants would receive some free "bonus stamps." National eligibility standards were established in 1971, and all states were required to inform low-income households about the availability of food stamps. In 1974, if any area of any state participated in the program, then the entire state had to participate. In 1977, the requirement that households purchase their food stamps with cash was eliminated, due to concern over low participation rates. It was believed that many needy households had difficulty obtaining enough cash each month to meet the purchase requirement. The elimination of the purchase requirement did not change the net dollar value of the subsidy received; households received fewer coupons, but did not have to pay for them. This legislation added an estimated 3.6 million participants to the Food Stamp Program (Ohls and Beebout, 1993). This was the most recent change to the fundamental structure of the program. The Food Stamp Program is the largest public assistance program that has
4 192 Journal of Economic Perspectives uniform national standards and is available to all households on the basis of financial need, regardless of age, family type or disability. For many low-income households, food stamps provide a major share of the family's total purchasing power. For a typical welfare family consisting of a single female head of household with two children, food stamps comprise about 25 percent of the family's household resources. In states that offer relatively low benefits through the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, this share can exceed 50 percent (Ohls and Beebout, 1993). Impact of Likely Cuts in the Food Stamp Program All of the reform proposals considered by the 104th Congress involved cuts in the size of the Food Stamp Program. The cuts range from $2 to $5 billion per year and $11 to $35 billion over the period from baseline funding (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1995b; Smallwood et al., 1995a,b). As of the time of this writing, the most likely cuts in the size of Food Stamp Program benefits seem likely to be about $20 billion over the period from 1996 to Reductions in food stamp benefits will decrease spending on food and other goods by low-income households. Food stamps do increase total spending on food, although the increase is less than the amount of the benefit. The marginal propensity to consume food from food stamps has been estimated in the range of.20 to.45 (Fraker, 1990; Ohls and Beebout, 1993; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1993, 1995a,b). While all of the food stamps are spent on food, funds previously spent on food are reallocated to other needs, such as rent, clothing or medical care. This marginal propensity to consume implies that the initial impact of a $20 billion decrease in Food Stamp Program benefits would be a decline of $4 to $9 billion over five years in retail food spending and a decline of $16 to $11 billion over five years in nonfood spending (Smallwood et al., 1995a). Preliminary research by the Economic Research Service calculated that this reduction in retail food expenditures would reduce gross farm income by $1 to $2 billion over the period , with the largest impacts on meat, dairy and vegetables (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1995a). In addition to a decline in gross farm income, falling commodity demand causes the cost of farm programs (under current law) to increase by about $187 to $420 million over the five-year period. We used a modified computable general equilibrium model based on Robinson, Kilkenny and Hanson (1990) to simulate economy-wide output and employment impacts from this reduction in Food Stamp Program benefits. Starting from a 1993 base, the model simulates the adjustments that would occur to the economy, given an annual average decline in the Food Stamp Program (a $20 billion cut over five years is treated as a $4 billion annual average cut). The model allows prices and wages to adjust to restore full employment and to readjust supply and demand for goods and services. The model also assumes that budgetary savings are returned
5 Policy Watch: The Food Stamp Program and Welfare Reform 193 to the economy either through deficit or tax reductions. With tax reduction, demand and, hence, jobs shift primarily into consumer goods and services. With deficit reduction, an increase in investment leads to a shift into durable goods and construction. Returning budget savings to the economy is the basis for maintaining the same total employment in the long run. 2 Assuming that savings from shrinking the Food Stamp Program are used for deficit reduction, farm sector annual output losses are estimated to be $0.2 billion (0.1 percent of sector output) to $0.5 billion (0.2 percent). Food processing and distribution sector annual output losses amount to $0.9 billion (0.15 percent) to $1.9 billion (0.3 percent). There is also a loss in output among service sectors of $1.3 billion to $0.7 billion (0.03 to 0.02 percent) as expenditures on consumer services are reduced to supplement food expenditures. Annual output in durable manufacturing expands by $2.3 billion (0.1 percent), while construction expands by $2.0 billion (0.25 percent). 3 Employment impacts display the same pattern the farm sector loses 3,000 to 6,000 jobs, food processing and distribution lose 14,000 to 25,000 jobs, services lose 11,000 to 19,000 jobs, durable manufacturing gains 15,000 to 16,000 jobs, and construction gains about 18,000 jobs. Cashing Out the Food Stamp Program In several of the options before Congress, states will have an option to receive a block grant for food stamps instead of participating in the federal program. If states elect to replace the Food Stamp Program with a block grant, many expect that states will also "cash-out" the program, which means substituting income assistance in place of coupons that must be spent on food. Proponents of cash-out argue that it reduces administrative expenses and enables low-income households to allocate their limited resources more efficiently among food, shelter, clothing and medical care. Cash benefits are also believed to reduce the stigma associated with using food stamp coupons (Ranney and Kushman, 1987), so it may increase participation rates. Opponents of cash-out believe that the current restriction, namely that food stamps must be spent on food, is the cornerstone of the political support for the program. This political support has come from food retailers, commodity groups, farm groups, and those more comfortable with providing food rather than direct cash support. In fact, food spending does increase more when assistance is provided in the form of food stamps instead of cash. The difference between the marginal propensity to consume food out of cash versus stamps is referred to as the "slippage" 2 Our analysis does not account for dynamic growth effects from investment into private capital or from potential changes in work incentives. 3 Output per worker differs across sectors. The reallocation of jobs from low-productivity sectors, agriculture and services, into high-productivity sectors, construction and durable goods manufacturing, leads to greater total production. For the tax cut scenario, see Smallwood et al. (1995a).
6 194 Journal of Economic Perspectives effect. On one hand, it is true that practically all poor households receiving food stamps spend more on food than their monthly allotment. Therefore, when they receive food stamps, they are able to allocate some income previously spent on food for other uses, such as rent, medical care or clothing. However, cash is clearly more fungible than food stamps and easier to transfer to other uses. The empirical evidence indicates that slippage falls in the range of 15 to 30 percent of benefits (Fraker, 1990; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1991). For example, consider a food stamp program whose size is unchanged, but that is converted from a coupon to a cash system. Assume food stamp benefits total $25 billion a year, or $125 billion over five years. With the marginal propensity to consume out of food stamps between.20 and.45, the increased food spending from the present program will be $25 billion to $56 billion. However, given percent slippage, the marginal propensity to consume food out of cash will be.05 to.15, and increased food spending from a cash assistance program would only be $6.25 billion to $18.75 billion. In other words, cashing out food stamp benefits would reduce food spending by $18.75 billion to $37.25 billion over the five-year period from 1996 to Such a decline in food spending would be two to four times larger than the initial spending cuts. Even assuming the larger marginal propensity to consume out of food stamps of.45, this amounts to only a $9 billion reduction in food spending over five years. Thus, the economic and employment impacts of cashing out food stamps could be two to four times as high as the initial spending cuts. Of course, if cashing out food stamps weakened political support for these payments as opponents of cashing out fear then the eventual cutbacks would be still larger. Interaction with Other Welfare Programs The main welfare programs available to low-income households are the Food Stamp Program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). These programs are inextricably linked by income eligibility, family composition, and/or administration. For instance, the Food Stamp Program and AFDC are typically administered by the same state or local office, and the food stamp recipient population is primarily composed of recipients of other government benefits. For most individuals participating in the Food Stamp Program, food stamps represent a second or third form of assistance. Fewer than 20 percent of food stamp households rely solely on nongovernmental sources for their cash income (U.S. House of Representatives, 1994). Other welfare programs vary considerably across states, with important implications for the Food Stamp Program. In the AFDC program, for example, states define benefit needs, set their own benefit levels, establish income and resource limits (within federal guidelines) and administer the program. The result has been a wide variance in AFDC transfers. Peterson and Rom (1990) estimate that over the period , the variation in AFDC payments among states has remained
7 Betsey A. Kuhn et al. 195 fairly stable and large, nearly $300 a month for a family of three. For example, the maximum AFDC grant in Mississippi, Alabama and Texas is less than $200 a month, while the maximum grant in New York, California and Connecticut exceeds $570 per month (U.S. House of Representatives, 1994). But as the level of cash assistance declines, food stamp benefits will increase, since food stamp benefits are based on income. Whenever cash assistance benefits are reduced by one dollar, food stamp benefits increase by about 30 cents. The strategic behavior by states to shift income support toward food stamps has received little attention. In one study, Moffitt (1990) found that the decline in real benefits in the AFDC program has been precipitated by state legislatures, which have allowed federally funded food stamps and federally subsidized Medicaid to substitute for AFDC. In another study, Peterson and Rom (1990) reported that the Food Stamp Program reduced interstate variation in combined total benefits by roughly one-half, compared to interstate variation prior to the creation of food stamps. Entitlement Status and Automatic Stabilizer Entitlements are programs in which an individual who meets the criteria for participation in the program is entided to its benefits. They are typically contrasted with programs subject to fixed spending limits. The Food Stamp Program is technically not an entitement; it is subject to an annual appropriation. In practice, however, it functions as an entitlement. States are required to serve all eligible people, and Congress has always appropriated sufficient funds for full operation of the program (Ohls and Beebout, 1993). As a de facto entitlement, expenditures on food stamps tended to rise and fall with the poverty rate, which often moves countercyclically. However, if food stamps are converted into a fixed block grant, then spending in this area would not adjust as the economy fluctuates. This raises the issue of whether food stamps would continue to function as an automatic stabilizer to the economy and whether converting them to a fixed block grant might exacerbate economic fluctuations. Little work has been done in this area, but there is some evidence that food stamps function as both a fiscal and a monetary stabilizer. Blank and Ruggles (1993) note that women who decide to participate in the program receive benefits almost immediately, which implies that the program reacts fairly quickly to economic downturns. Hamermesh and Johannes (1985) found that food stamps were substitutable for money, and thus food stamps cause both the money stock (broadly understood) and disposable income to increase during a recession. Our work on the short-run employment impacts associated with reductions in the size of the Food Stamp Program indicates that a $1 billion reduction in the size of food assistance programs is associated with a reduction of about 25,000 jobs
8 196 Journal of Economic Perspectives nationally (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1995b). 4 This implies that rises and falls in food stamp spending have the appropriate short-term effects to help stabilize the economy. We do not want to overstate the ability of the Food Stamp Program to function as an automatic stabilizer. From 1992 to 1995, for example, food stamp spending increased even though the economy was in an upturn. The reason was straightforward: economic growth was accompanied by a widening income distribution, and as the number of people living in poverty increased, so did food stamp spending. Movements in food stamp spending and the economy are not always inversely related to each other. However, the number of people receiving food stamps did decline as the economy grew in 1995 (Dixon, 1995). Combining Cuts in Food Stamps, Cash-Out and Interactions with Other Welfare Programs In this section, we combine four ways food spending will be affected by overall welfare reform 1) direct reductions in food stamp benefits; 2) changes in the form of assistance; 3) changes in food stamp benefits due to changes in cash assistance through other programs; and 4) reductions in cash assistance in other programs and offer a rough scenario of the overall impact. Table 2 contains estimates of changes in benefits associated with one of the leading proposals, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of The first row shows baseline federal funding for the Food Stamp Program out to the year The second row shows the level of funding if all states elect a block grant, which does not increase, thus resulting in a fall of $11 billion in federal spending on food stamp programs from 1996 to The third row gives the proposed reductions in cash assistance paid through AFDC, SSI and child support programs, which total approximately $37 billion over five years. The fourth row shows the increase in food stamp benefits (if it remains an entitlement) as the cash support programs are reduced. We ran 10 scenarios in which we varied several key parameters: how many states elect block grants; the amount of funds diverted from food benefits; how consumers respond to food assistance or supplementation; and how consumers respond to different types of food assistance or slippage (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1995b). To give a sense of our results, consider one mainstream scenario. States are offered an option to convert food stamps to a block grant, and 25 percent of 4 This data is based on 1987 data. A preliminary estimate based on 1993 data suggests a reduction of approximately 14,000 jobs nationally. 5 In January 1996, President Clinton vetoed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of At the same time, the administration presented a new balanced-budget proposal calling for a balanced budget by Reductions in the Food Stamp Program would total $20.6 billion over seven years, with no block grant option for the states.
9 Policy Watch: The Food Stamp Program and Welfare Reform 197 Table 2 Proposed Food Stamp and Cash Assistance Funding, states take the block grant option. These states then take 7 percent of the food stamp block grant, half of the funds that can be diverted to other uses such as wage supplements or job training, and use it for those purposes. This step alone would reduce food stamp benefits by $19.7 billion over the five-year period. At the same time, cash support payments like AFDC, SSI and child support programs are cut by $37 billion over five years, as mentioned earlier. This lower income makes recipients eligible for increased food stamp benefits of $4.5 billion. Thus, the overall effect on food stamp benefits would be a drop of $15.2 billion. The decrease in food stamp and cash benefits reduces retail food spending by $5 $10 billion over five years. 6 Gross farm income falls by $1.3 $2.8 billion, and farm program costs increase by $230 $495 million from 1996 to Short-term economy-wide annual impacts range from decreases of $3.2 $5.3 billion in the output of the food sector, and decreases of $16.2 $14.5 billion in the nonfood sector. If we assume that Food Stamp Program savings are used to support a tax decrease for all consumers, longterm cumulative impacts over the period 1996 to 2000 range from decreases in output of $4.0 $11.l billion in the food sector to increases in output of $7.5 $10.6 billion in the nonfood sector. Changes in food stamps, block grants, state flexibility, AFDC, Medicaid and other assistance programs will affect not only the income and incentives of the poor, but also the mix of jobs and extent of stability in the economy as a whole. Given the restructuring of AFDC and Medicaid presently under discussion, the impor- 6 This decline in food spending is roughly equal to the drop that would result from a $20 billion cut in food stamps over five years, which was our first example in this paper. Thus, it is less than what would result if food stamp benefits were cashed out all over the country, as discussed in that section of the paper.
10 198 Journal of Economic Perspectives tance of understanding the relationship of these programs to food stamps and to each other will only increase. This paper has benefitted from the thoughtful comments of Alan Auerbach, Alan Krueger, William Levedahl and Timothy Taylor. References Blank, Rebecca M., and Patricia Ruggles, "When Do Women Use AFDC & Food Stamps? The Dynamics of Eligibility vs. Participation." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 4429, Dixon, Jennifer, "Food Stamp Rolls Down by 1 Million Since '94," The Washington Post, June 1, 1995, 21A. Fraker, Thomas M., The Effects of Food Stamps on Food Consumption: A Review of the Literature. Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research, Hamermesh, Daniel S., and James M. Johannes, "Food Stamps as Money: The Macroeconomics of a Transfer Program," Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93:1, Kinsey, Jean D., and David M. Smallwood, "Domestic Food Aid Programs." In Hallberg, M., R. Spitze, and D. Ray, eds., Food, Agriculture and Rural Policy into the Twenty-First Century: Issues and Trade-Offs. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1994, pp Moffitt, Robert, "Has State Redistribution Policy Grown More Conservative?," National Tax Journal, 1990, 53:2, Ohls, James C., and Harold Beebout, The Food Stamp Program: Design Tradeoffs, Policy, and Impacts. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press, Peterson, Paul E., and Mark C. Rom, Welfare Magnets: A Case for a New National Standards. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, Ranney, Christine K., and John E. Kushman, "Cash Equivalence, Welfare Stigma, and Food Stamps," Southern Economic Journal, April 1987, 53, Robinson, Sherman, Maureen Kilkenny, and Kenneth A. Hanson, "The USDA/ERS Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model of the United States." Economic Research Service Staff Paper No. AGES-9049, Smallwood, David M., et al., "Proposed Reforms in the Food Stamp Program: Economic Impacts on Agriculture and the Economy." Economic Research Service Staff Paper No. AGES9516, 1995a. Smallwood, David M., et al., "Proposed Reforms in the Food Stamp Program: Economic Impacts on Agriculture and the Economy of the Work Opportunity Act of 1995." Economic Research Service Staff Paper No. AGES-9520, 1995b. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, "The Effects of Food Stamps on Food Consumption: A Review of the Literature," Family Economics Review, 1991, 4:3, 28. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, "The Economics of Food Assistance Programs," briefing paper, Economic Research Service, 1995a. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Food and Consumer Service, "The Nutrition, Health, and Economic Consequences of Block Grants for Federal Food Assistance Programs," joint staff report, Economic Research Service and Food and Consumer Services, 1995b. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Service, "New Directions in Food Stamp Policy," papers presented at the Food and Consumer Service Research Conference, June U.S. House of Representative, Committee on Ways and Means, 1994 Green Book. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994.
December 15, 1995 No. 17
WASHINGTON WATCH An update on federal action from The Center for Public Policy Priorities 900 Lydia Street Austin, Texas 78702 512-320-0222 voice 512-320-0227 fax December 15, 1995 No. 17 A Brief Update
More informationFood Stamp Program State Options Report
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Fourth Edition Food Stamp Program State s Report September 2004 vember 2002 Program Development Division Program Design Branch Food Stamp
More informationMedicaid and Block Grant Financing Compared
P O L I C Y kaiser commission on medicaid a n d t h e uninsured January 2004 B R I E F Medicaid and Block Grant Financing Compared State and federal budget pressures, rising health care costs, and new
More informationFISCAL FEDERALISM. How State and Local Governments Differ from the National Government
FISCAL FEDERALISM devolution: The passing or transferring of fiscal responsibilities and authority from one level of government to another. In August 1996, Congress approved legislation ending 60-year
More informationFood Stamp Program State Options Report
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Fifth Edition Food Stamp Program State s Report August 2005 vember 2002 Program Development Division Food Stamp Program State s Report
More informationLessons from TANF: Block-Granting a Safety-Net Program Has Significantly Reduced Its Effectiveness
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org February 22, 2017 Lessons from TANF: Block-Granting a Safety-Net Program Has Significantly
More information2017 STATUS REPORT on
2017 STATUS REPORT on Hunger in Rhode Island Congress Plans to Cut Food Assistance as More Rhode Islanders Face Hunger Congress Proposes Cuts to Key Programs Congress is prepared to make significant cuts
More informationEconomics Chapter 3 Review
Name: Class: Date: ID: A Economics Chapter 3 Review Completion Complete each statement. 1. The right of allows people to buy or sell what they choose. 2. A woman has the right of, so she can sign an agreement
More informationTemporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Financing Issues
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Financing Issues Gene Falk Specialist in Social Policy September 8, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44188 Summary The Temporary Assistance
More informationStatus Report. on the. Pell Grant Program AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
2000 Status Report on the Pell Grant Program AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS 2000 Status Report on the Pell Grant Program JACQUELINE E. KING AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION CENTER
More informationFigure 1: 17 States Will No Longer Receive TANF Supplemental Grants Beginning July 1, June 27, 2011
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org June 27, 2011 EXPIRATION OF TANF SUPPLEMENTAL GRANTS A FURTHER SIGN OF WEAKENING FEDERAL
More informationFunding for Housing, Health, and Social Services Block Grants Has Fallen Markedly Over Time
See http://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/block-granting-low-income-programs-leads-to-largefunding-declines-over-time for a more recent version of this analysis. Updated March 24, 2016 Funding for
More informationThe Tide Ahead: Upcoming Changes to Financial Aid. Midwestern Regional Forum February 2012
The Tide Ahead: Upcoming Changes to Financial Aid Midwestern Regional Forum February 2012 Current Federal and State Issues Pell Grant expenditures have doubled since 2008-09 Increases not sustainable Federal
More informationTHE STATE OF THE MILITARY
THE STATE OF THE MILITARY What impact has military downsizing had on Hampton Roads? From the sprawling Naval Station Norfolk, home port of the Atlantic Fleet, to Fort Eustis, the Peninsula s largest military
More informationWashington, D.C CHRONOLOGY AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL FOOD ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION
Washington, D.C. 20540 CHRONOLOGY AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL FOOD ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION 1935-1983 Jean Yavis Jones Specialist in Social Legislation Education and Public We1 fare Division June 25,
More informationStatus Report. Pell Grant
2003 Status Report on the Pell Grant Program Jacqueline E. King American Council on Education Center for Policy Analysis Acknowledgments The comments of several reviewers helped improve this publication,
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Family Subsistence Supplemental Allowance (FSSA) Program
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1341.11 March 4, 2008 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Family Subsistence Supplemental Allowance (FSSA) Program References: (a) DoD Instruction 1341.11, Family Subsistence Supplemental
More informationThe U.S. Economic Crisis and a Revised New Jobs Tax Credit
Upjohn Institute Policy Papers Upjohn Research home page 2008 The U.S. Economic Crisis and a Revised New Jobs Tax Credit Timothy J. Bartik W.E. Upjohn Institute, bartik@upjohn.org Policy Paper No. 2008-003
More informationTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) Background Information
TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) Background Information Introduction The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant provides federal funding to states for a wide range of
More informationThe Financial Returns from Oil and Natural Gas Company Stocks Held by American College and University Endowments. Robert J.
The Financial Returns from Oil and Natural Gas Company Stocks Held by American College and University Endowments Robert J. Shapiro September 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Executive Summary.....
More informationTable 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)
Revised February 22, 2005 WHERE WOULD THE CUTS BE MADE UNDER THE PRESIDENT S BUDGET? Data Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education Includes Education for the Disadvantaged, Impact Aid, School Improvement
More informationAsset Transfer and Nursing Home Use: Empirical Evidence and Policy Significance
April 2006 Asset Transfer and Nursing Home Use: Empirical Evidence and Policy Significance Timothy Waidmann and Korbin Liu The Urban Institute The perception that many well-to-do elderly Americans transfer
More informationCounting for Dollars: Polk County, Florida
Counting for Dollars: Polk County, Florida Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Polk County, Florida on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists federal
More informationSimplifying Federal Student Aid
E D U C A T I O N A N D T R A I N I N G Simplifying Federal Student Aid A Closer Look at Pell Formulas with Two Inputs Kim Rueben, Sarah Gault, and Sandy Baum April 2016 This brief examines proposals that
More informationCounting for Dollars: Sedgwick County, Kansas
Counting for Dollars: Sedgwick County, Kansas Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Sedgwick County, Kansas on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists
More informationHuman Services Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Human Services Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 As of February 26, 2009 Background On February 11, the House and Senate announced a conference agreement resolving differences
More informationCounting for Dollars: Tulare County, California
Counting for Dollars: Tulare County, California Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Tulare County, California on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists
More informationFlorida s Financially-Based Economic Development Tools & Return on Investment
Florida s Financially-Based Economic Development Tools & Return on Investment January 11, 2017 Presented by: The Florida Legislature Office of Economic and Demographic Research 850.487.1402 http://edr.state.fl.us
More informationState $ Billion (23%) Federal $717.1 Billion (77%)
Chart 1 Federal and State Shares of Total Means-Tested Welfare Spending FY2011 State $210..1 Billion (23%) Federal $717.1 Billion (77%) Chart 2 Federal and State Welfare Spending by Type of Aid FY2011
More informationHistory of Medicaid shows the program s value in combating poverty and providing access to health
History of Medicaid shows the program s value in combating poverty and providing access to health ISSUE BRIEF Feb. 3, 2012 Elisabeth Arenales Health care director 789 Sherman St. Suite 300 Denver, CO 80203
More informationCounting for Dollars: Fresno County, California
Counting for Dollars: Fresno County, California Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Fresno County, California on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists
More informationConnecticut s Reliance on Federal Funds
Connecticut s Reliance on Federal Funds What s at Stake in the Upcoming Federal Budget Debate January 2005 CT Voices state budget work is supported by the Melville Charitable Trust, the Stoneman Family
More informationSUBSIDIES IN THE AMERICAN ECONOMY
SUBSIDIES IN THE AMERICAN ECONOMY Wallace Barr, Extension Economist Ohio State University The existence of subsidies is widely known, but their intent, use, or function is little understood. Farm subsidies
More informationThe Budget: Maximizing Federal Reimbursement For Parolee Mental Health Care Summary
The 2013-14 Budget: Maximizing Federal Reimbursement For Parolee Mental Health Care MAC Taylor Legislative Analyst MAY 6, 2013 Summary Historically, the state has spent tens of millions of dollars annually
More informationUnderstanding the Federal Economic Stimulus Legislation and the Expected Impact on Kentucky
Contact: Brigitte Blom Ramsey, bramsey@kyyouth.org May 2009 Understanding the Federal Economic Stimulus Legislation and the Expected Impact on Kentucky The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
More informationFood Stamps Caseload Distribution (FS)... 1
Table of Contents General Program Information 0210.0000 Food Stamps... 1 0210.0001 Caseload Distribution (FS)... 1 0210.0100 FOOD STAMP PROGRAM (FS)... 1 0210.0101 Legal Basis (FS)... 1 0210.0102 Program
More informationHousing HOME Program HUD $2.25 billion To be used for capital investments in Assure HPRP program staff
List of Funded Programs and Opportunities Housing Community HUD $1 billion Provides communities with funding to Assure HPRP program staff Development Block ensure affordable housing. 70 percent are aware
More informationFeasibility Analysis for Utilizing The Benefit Bank in North Carolina
Feasibility Analysis for Utilizing The Benefit Bank in North Carolina May 2009 Completed under Contract for the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation Winston-Salem, North Carolina By Ralph Gildehaus MDC, Inc. Chapel
More informationCounting for Dollars: Pinal County, Arizona
Counting for Dollars: Pinal County, Arizona Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Pinal County, Arizona on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists federal
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE BILL 250* Short Title: Healthy Food Small Retailer/Corner Store Act.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE BILL 250* Short Title: Healthy Food Small Retailer/Corner Store Act. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Holley, Whitmire, B. Brown, and
More informationHouse Proposal to Block-Grant School Meal Programs Would Put Children s Nutrition at Risk
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org July 8, 2016 House Proposal to Block-Grant School Meal Programs Would Put Children s
More informationThe Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations
2016 REPORT www.idahononprofits.org The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations RESEARCH REPORT Created by: Don Reading Ben Johnson Associates Boise, Idaho Steven Peterson Research Economist
More informationThe Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan
pwc.com/us/nes The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan June 2016 Prepared for The Community Foundation
More informationSSI/SSP Grants in California: Key Context and Recent Trends
SSI/SSP Grants in California: Key Context and Recent Trends SCOTT GRAVES, DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH MARCH 17, 2015 JOINT HEARING OF THE ASSEMBLY AGING AND LONG-TERM CARE COMMITTEE AND THE ASSEMBLY HUMAN SERVICES
More informationTestimony of. Before the House Armed Services Committee on the Economic Consequences of Defense Sequestration. October 26, 2011
Testimony of Stephen S. Fuller, Ph.D., Dwight Schar Faculty Chair, University Professor and Director of the Center for Regional Analysis George Mason University Before the House Armed Services Committee
More informationInnovation and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs)
Innovation and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) Kenneth R. White, PhD, FACHE Professor of Health Administration Department of Health Administration Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 23298
More informationFOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE (FNS) RESEARCH AND EVALUATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR March 2017
FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE (FNS) RESEARCH AND EVALUATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2017 March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 IMPROVE PROGRAM ACCESS AND REDUCE HUNGER... 2 IMPROVE NUTRITION AND REDUCE
More informationINFOBRIEF SRS TOP R&D-PERFORMING STATES DISPLAY DIVERSE R&D PATTERNS IN 2000
INFOBRIEF SRS Science Resources Statistics National Science Foundation NSF 03-303 Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences November 2002 TOP R&D-PERFORMING STATES DISPLAY DIVERSE R&D PATTERNS
More informationU. S. Department of Agriculture
: 10.551 10.561 State Project/Program: STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MATCHING GRANTS FOR STATE ADMINISTRATIVE MATCHING GRANTS FOR PROGRAM U. S. Department of Agriculture APRIL 2012 Federal Authorization: State
More informationCounting for Dollars: Broward County, Florida
Counting for Dollars: Broward County, Florida Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Broward County, Florida on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Global value chains and globalisation. International sourcing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Global value chains and globalisation The pace and scale of today s globalisation is without precedent and is associated with the rapid emergence of global value chains
More informationCounting for Dollars: Sonoma County, California
Counting for Dollars: Sonoma County, California Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Sonoma County, California on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists
More informationMaking the Business Case
Making the Business Case for Payment and Delivery Reform Harold D. Miller Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform To learn more about RWJFsupported payment reform activities, visit RWJF s Payment
More informationChapter 29. Introduction. Learning Objectives. The Labor Market: Demand, Supply, and Outsourcing
Chapter 29 The Labor Market: Demand, Supply, and Outsourcing Introduction Technovate and 24/7 sound like U.S. based firms, but in fact, they are located in India. The companies offer low-cost labor services
More informationCounting for Dollars: Jefferson County, Alabama
Counting for Dollars: Jefferson County, Alabama Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Jefferson County, Alabama on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists
More informationCounting for Dollars: Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Counting for Dollars: Tulsa County, Oklahoma Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Tulsa County, Oklahoma on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists federal
More informationTelecommuting or doing work
Brookings Greater Washington Research Program Washington Area Trends While studies have evaluated Effects of Telecommuting on Central City Tax Bases by Philip M. Dearborn, Senior Fellow, The Brookings
More informationSECTION 1: UPDATES ON 5 YEAR PLAN
Office of Program Support, Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities SECTION 1: UPDATES ON 5 YEAR PLAN PROGRAMMATIC CHANGES TO THE UCEDD 5-YEAR PLAN There are no changes to the goals
More informationSTATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Business in Nebraska Bureau of Business Research 12-2013 STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX Eric Thompson University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
More informationGAO MILITARY BASE CLOSURES. DOD's Updated Net Savings Estimate Remains Substantial. Report to the Honorable Vic Snyder House of Representatives
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Vic Snyder House of Representatives July 2001 MILITARY BASE CLOSURES DOD's Updated Net Savings Estimate Remains Substantial GAO-01-971
More informationCosts & Benefits Reconsidered
The Hilltop Institute Symposium Home and Community-Based Services: Examining the Evidence Base for State Policymakers June 11, 2009 The Caregiving Continuum: Costs & Benefits Reconsidered Peter S. Arno,
More informationMedicare and Medicaid
Medicare and Medicaid Medicare Medicare is a multi-part federal health insurance program managed by the federal government. A person applies for Medicare through the Social Security Administration, but
More informationContracts and Grants between Nonprofits and Government
br I e f # 03 DeC. 2013 Government-Nonprofit Contracting Relationships www.urban.org INsIDe this IssUe In 2012, local, state, and federal governments worked with nearly 56,000 nonprofit organizations.
More informationTOOLKIT. Skills-Based SNAP Employment and Training Policy SKILLS IN THE STATES PART OF NSC S SKILLS EQUITY AGENDA JOB-DRIVEN FINANCIAL AID
SKILLS IN THE STATES Skills-Based SNAP Employment and Training Policy TOOLKIT PART OF NSC S SKILLS EQUITY AGENDA JOB-DRIVEN FINANCIAL AID ALIGNMENT STACKABLE INTEGRATED EDUCATION CREDENTIALS AND TRAINING
More informationFEDERAL SPENDING AND REVENUES IN ALASKA
FEDERAL SPENDING AND REVENUES IN ALASKA Prepared by Scott Goldsmith and Eric Larson November 20, 2003 Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage,
More informationNational Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles
www.urban.org Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles Sarah L. Pettijohn, Elizabeth T. Boris, and Maura R. Farrell Data presented for each state: Problems with Government
More information2013 Lien Conference on Public Administration Singapore
Dean Jack H. Knott Price School of Public Policy University of Southern California 2013 Lien Conference on Public Administration Singapore It s great to be here. I want to say how honored I am to participate
More informationQuestions and Answers Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Employment and Unemployment Data Release July 2018 (Released August 17, 2018)
Questions and Answers Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Employment and Unemployment Data Release July 2018 (Released August 17, 2018) 1. What are the current Florida labor statistics and what
More informationFiscal Research Center
January 2018 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
More informationSpecialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance 2012 Farm Bill Policy Recommendations
Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance 2012 Farm Bill Policy Recommendations Planting Flexibility Restrictions Title I Commodities Policy Recommendation Congress should maintain current law regarding U.S. planting
More informationAsset Transfer and Nursing Home Use
I S S U E kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured November 2005 P A P E R Issue Asset Transfer and Nursing Home Use Medicaid paid for nearly half of the $183 billion spent nationally for long-term
More informationFinal Report No. 101 April Trends in Skilled Nursing Facility and Swing Bed Use in Rural Areas Following the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003
Final Report No. 101 April 2011 Trends in Skilled Nursing Facility and Swing Bed Use in Rural Areas Following the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 The North Carolina Rural Health Research & Policy Analysis
More informationSummary TANF Provisions of The Budget Reconciliation Act of 2005 S. 1932, Title VII, Subtitle A, Sections 7101 through 7103
Summary TANF Provisions of The Budget Reconciliation Act of 2005 S. 1932, Title VII, Subtitle A, Sections 7101 through 7103 The information below summarizes the impacts of the TANF provisions of the Deficit
More informationFOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT
FOOD STAMP PROGRAM ACTIVITY REPORT Federal Fiscal Year 2004 Food Stamps Make America Stronger United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Program Accountability Division February
More informationEconomic Contributions of the Louisiana Nonprofit Sector: Size and Scope
MAY 2018 Economic Contributions of the Louisiana Nonprofit Sector: Size and Scope This capstone report was completed in fulfillment of a Master of Public Service and Administration degree from the Bush
More informationSummary Currently, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) distributes four Homeless Assistance Grants, each of which provides fund
The HUD Homeless Assistance Grants: Distribution of Funds Libby Perl Specialist in Housing Policy June 22, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
More informationEconomic Contribution of the North Dakota University System in 2015
Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 729 May 2017 Economic Contribution of the North Dakota University System in 2015 Randal C. Coon Dean A. Bangsund Nancy M. Hodur Department of Agribusiness
More informationEconomic Impact of Human Services in Santa Cruz County
Economic Impact of Human Services in Santa Cruz County Public safety-net programs and economic benefits for the community Presented by: Cecilia Espinola Director, Human Services Department In conjunction
More informationCounting for Dollars: Syracuse, NY
Counting for Dollars: Syracuse, NY Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in the Syracuse, NY Metropolitan Area on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists
More informationDid the Los Angeles Children s Health Initiative Outreach Effort Increase Enrollment in Medi-Cal?
Did the Los Angeles Children s Health Initiative Outreach Effort Increase Enrollment in Medi-Cal? Prepared for: The California Endowment Prepared by: Anna Sommers Ariel Klein Ian Hill Joshua McFeeters
More informationWORKING P A P E R. Informing, Enrolling, and Reenrolling CalWORKs Leavers in Food Stamps and Medi-Cal JACOB ALEX KLERMAN AMY G.
WORKING P A P E R Informing, Enrolling, and Reenrolling CalWORKs Leavers in Food Stamps and Medi-Cal JACOB ALEX KLERMAN AMY G. COX WR-732 December 2009 This product is part of the RAND Labor and Population
More informationWorking Paper Series
The Financial Benefits of Critical Access Hospital Conversion for FY 1999 and FY 2000 Converters Working Paper Series Jeffrey Stensland, Ph.D. Project HOPE (and currently MedPAC) Gestur Davidson, Ph.D.
More informationNew Strategy for the War on Poverty
New Strategy for the War on Poverty Housing and Urban Development Secretary Jack Kemp outlines the Bush Administration's agenda to help low-income people combat poverty and despair Page 1 of 9 "... let
More informationGRANT SYSTEMS. Block and categorical grants
Kelly Andrisano, J.D., Executive Director PACHSA 17 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Kandrisano@pacounties.org (717) 232-7554 x 3132 GRANT SYSTEMS Block and categorical grants Pennsylvania has cooperatively
More informationThe Unemployed and Job Openings: A Data Primer
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 1-31-2013 The Unemployed and Job Openings: A Data Primer Donald Hirasuna Congressional Research Service Follow
More informationIntroduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:
MEMORANDUM May 8, 2018 Subject: TANF Family Assistance Grant Allocations Under the Ways and Means Committee (Majority) Proposal From: Gene Falk, Specialist in Social Policy, gfalk@crs.loc.gov, 7-7344 Jameson
More informationNURSING FACILITY SERVICES
WV INCOME CHAPTER 17 - LONG TERM CARE 17.9 17.9 INCOME There is a two-step income process for providing Medicaid coverage for nursing facility services to individuals in nursing facilities. The client
More informationFossil Fuel Subsidy Reform
2015/FMP/WKSP1/016 Session: 5 Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform Submitted by: United States Workshop on Fiscal Management Through Transparency and Reforms Bagac, Philippines 9-10 June 2015 Fossil Fuel Subsidy
More informationCalifornia s Share of Federal Formula Grants:
F E D E R A L F O R M U L A G R A N T S A N D C A L I F O R N I A California s Share of Federal Formula Grants: 1991 2001 Tim Ransdell December 2002 This report examines California s share of federal government
More informationFiscal Research Center
January 2017 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
More informationGrants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments
Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments Introduction FFIS has been in the federal grant reporting business for a long time about 30 years. The main thing we ve learned
More informationCHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS
CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS SECTION PAGE(S) SEFA Guidance Intro 1 2 Example of SEFA 1 1 3 Frequently Asked Questions with Answers 2 1 2 Notes to the SEFA (Example)
More informationDHS Budget Cuts SFY 2017
DHS Budget Cuts SFY 2017 SFY 2017 Budget Snapshot SFY 16 Total Operating Costs $755 SFY 17 Total Available Revenue -652 Net Budget Shortfall *$(103) *SFY 17 shortfall includes $46 million of unfunded cost
More informationColombia s lesson in economic development
1 J U L Y 2 0 1 0 Colombia s lesson in economic development A faster pace of economic development calls for microlevel reforms to help specific sectors and companies become more competitive in global markets.
More informationRURAL BRIEF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS. Department of Agriculture
CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS RURAL BRIEF VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1 MARCH 2009 AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), the stimulus
More informationUS SERVICES TRADE AND OFF-SHORING
US SERVICES TRADE AND OFF-SHORING Martin Neil Baily With the Assistance of Matt Johnson The Brookings Institution Presentation at Princeton s CEPS Symposium on Off-Shoring November 16-17, 2007 The Broader
More informationFederal Stimulus Dollars for Louisiana
Louisiana Budget Project April 2009 Federal Stimulus Dollars for Louisiana The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) became law on February 17, 2009. Created to stimulate employment and
More informationMODELLING THE INFLUENCE OF SUBSIDIZATION ON ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY PERFORMANCE: CASE STUDY
24 th International Conference on Electricity Distribution Glasgow, 12-15 June 217 Paper 449 MODELLING THE INFLUENCE OF SUBSIDIZATION ON ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION COMPANY PERFORMANCE: CASE STUDY Behrooz. Adeli
More informationServing the Community Well:
Serving the Community Well: The Economic Impact of Wichita s Health Care and Related Industries 2010 Analysis prepared by: Center for Economic Development and Business Research W. Frank Barton School of
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons
University of South Florida Scholar Commons College of Business Publications College of Business 3-1-2004 The economic contributions of Florida's small business development centers to the state economy
More information