School Facility Program Review Fall Conference Responses from Membership SUMMARY OF NEW PROGRAM CONCEPTS COLLECTED
|
|
- Clarissa Cook
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 School Facility Program Review Fall Conference Responses from Membership SUMMARY OF NEW PROGRAM CONCEPTS COLLECTED FALL CONFERENCE BREAK-OUT SESSION OCTOBER 17, 2012 The final activity at the Fall Conference in Costa Mesa was a break-out session designed to seek input from members on ideas to improve the State School Facility Program (SFP). The break-out session yielded responses that were reviewed and discussed at the conclusion of the activity with the assembled conferees. A summary of the break-out session input is provided below. The synthesis of the ideas generated is provided according to the existing SFP categories. Included also are responses to the research presented at the Fall Conference by Dr. Jeff Vincent from the Berkeley Center for Cities and Schools. Ideas of C.A.S.H. Members for the Creation a New School Facility Program New Construction Definition of Classroom The need for a new definition of classroom was identified. This was seen as fundamental and requiring a specific focus within the program. The California Department of Education (CDE) is seen as the appropriate authority to address the issue. Flexibility is believed needed for CDE to dialogue with and eventually concur with school districts on what areas within a school plan are classrooms. It was noted that agreement between state agencies about classroom definition is currently lacking within the program. Eligibility for New Construction: Base-Line of Classroom Capacity It was suggested that there is a need to establish the 1 st time the seat was built for students. The date of occupancy should be assumed to be one year following the date of the approval of plans by the Division of the State Architect (DSA). This concept was seen as fundamental both for establishing a baseline of existing facility classroom capacity as well as providing adequate facilities for accommodating future student growth and future program needs. An existing school building may have been altered to accommodate changing program needs at the site; the applicant district s determination of existing classrooms within a building may not conform to prior baseline data filed with the state under the Lease- Purchase Program (LPP) or the School Facility Program (SFP). It was suggested that this should be reviewed and adjudicated by CDE using plans and specifications available. Base-line Factors of the New School Facilities Program The base-line factors of importance to allow eligibility for new construction should take into consideration the need for new schools and the need for new infrastructure on existing campuses. Such should include: 1. Age of buildings on the campus 2. Adequacy of restrooms on the campus 3. The construction type and condition of the buildings on each campus: a. AB 300 designated buildings b. Portable buildings in use as classrooms or instructional support c. Portable buildings in use as food service, multi-use;
2 d. Non-conforming buildings in use 4. Age of the underground infrastructure on the campus (water and sewer lines) 5. Age of the building improvements, such as major repairs, modernization, or rehabilitation on each campus 6. Any DSA approved construction under local, state or federal funding 7. The serviceable nature of the classroom infrastructure 8. The serviceable nature of the non-classroom infrastructure 9. The adequacy of off-site infrastructure at the site 10. The impact of environmental/external factors on the use of the school site (health and safety) 11. Overcrowding factors based upon a reasonable standard 12. The cost-benefit of the preservation of existing buildings Modernization The Re-Review of Prior Modernization Work and Eligibility It was suggested that the modernization clock must be reset to allow greater access to adequate state funding for previously modernized school buildings. For existing building capacity any modernization funded under the state LPP or the SFP or major work requiring the approval of DSA should be documented with major building modifications noted. Existing deficiencies then must be documented. Program reform must either ignore all previous modernization done under state funding approvals or must provide a second or additional modernization funding level that is substantial enough to address major needs of the campus. It is noted that the modernization program began in 1982 with eligibility for school buildings of at least 30 years to qualify for funding; that was changed to 25 years in A 50 year old building age category was added to the SFP in Focus on Actual Need of Buildings The focus of the modernization program must be on actual need rather than a cookie cutter funding mechanism as currently utilized. An estimate of the funds required addressing the reality of the conditions of school building must be at the core of the modernization reform program. The structural, fire and life safety, access compliance requirements of code as well as the mechanical, lighting, roofing systems and other building components must be assessed with repair/replacement estimates of the project being directly linked to the funding allocation rather than a per pupil grant. Such program reform will actually provide a means of addressing Williams issues, facility hardship and the seismic reviews and repairs/replacement intended by AB 300. Educational Program and Facility Linkage The new modernization program must also have a relationship to the educational program requirements of the building/schools; such must be included in the core of the modernization reform program funding. Under the modernization reforms the educational program needs and facility needs of the various programs including pre-kindergarten, career technical education, special education, class size reduction and specialty classrooms for science and technology can be more adequately addressed. Overcrowding Relief Grants (ORG) It was stated by some that this program is not relevant for the needs of today. Others stated that the ORG program must be retained and restructured so as to be more agile with a closer look given to the other overcrowding conditions of existing buildings other than classrooms and on school sites. Consideration should be given to a blending of the ORG and Modernization programs to allow districts to reconstruct/rebuild and if needed, to build new areas through the use of a weighting formula.
3 Seismic Seismic needs should be part of the baseline building evaluation for Modernization. The AB 300 criteria should not be separate and distinct; the building structural safety and other needs must be part of the overall school project evaluation as noted above. The evaluation must take into consideration each building, the entire compliment of buildings and how these function to serve the school population and programs and the site itself. Career Technical Education (CTE) This program should be retained and incorporated into the New Construction and Modernization Programs as educational improvements required at the school to meet program needs. Applications for SFP funding currently requires documentation related to CTE when not included in a project. High Performance Incentive Grants This should be retained, streamlined and should be included in the base grant. The current justification for program consideration and funding is much too extensive. It deters rather than incentivizes. If the High Performance Incentive Program remains as an add-on component of the program for new construction and modernization such should include a funding calculation directly related to the cost of sustainable components or actions sought through the HPI program. Joint Use Cities and schools should be community centers and resources to a greater extent than they are now. There should be in law the ability to cultivate private funding. The exploration of the alignment of school construction with private development must be encouraged. Private funding and corporate sponsorship of CTE should be incentivized. Charter These are now a political reality. As such charters should not have a set aside of funds; charters should be part of the regular SFP funding categories. Summary The emphasis of the new program should be on rebuilding and reusing existing facilities. New construction is important however the preservation and improvement of existing stock is critical. The establishment of a base-line of existing school infrastructure should give consideration to and focus upon the following categories: a. Adequacy of the site b. Classroom Capacity: A. Adequacy for use B. Suitability for the instruction program c. Non-classroom building adequacy for need intended d. Capacity of the facility to support the educational program
4 The evaluation of the classrooms, the ancillary facilities and the school site should determine whether the infrastructure should be eligible for renewal or for replacement-construction (complete replacement of one or more buildings or replacement of more than 50% of the buildings and underground infrastructure at the site). Replacement of the school stock that has exceeded the replacement value should be determined using the 50% replacement value measure in Title 24 for reconstruction. If a building or school no longer meets the needs of the educational program the only economically efficient option may be replacement. The Modernization program should therefore allow for the option to teardown and rebuild. A new CCI should be allocated to renew/replace buildings. A new weighting formula created for overcrowding replacement issues as well as for the new modernization concepts of renewal and replacement-construction is needed. Additional funding will be necessary. The timeliness of funding the project should reflect the districts needs. The existing system of districts spending local funds (part of the local match contribution) to advance a project to construction readiness should be replaced. A more efficient process, modeled after the Critically Overcrowded Schools (COS) program, should be considered wherein the district applies for a preliminary apportionment for a specific funding level, demonstrates its capacity to fund the local share and is granted a reservation of future funding for a reasonable period of time such as 36 months. The district must reach the construction ready stage within the three years or lose the reservation of funds. This funding reservation mechanism would assure districts of state funding being available by matching local funds with actual state bond authority. The new program should recognize that many older projects will need to be phased for modernization or renewal. The funding mechanism should be create in such a manner to permit the apportionment and construction phases to be exercised flexibly to commence and complete a modernization or renewal project or other project on an active school site over a period of time recognizing that students cannot be easily displaced and that interim housing is expensive and should be avoided if possible. Replacing the existing Modernization statute with a program not be based upon a per pupil grant. The baseline inventory for the new Modernization program will need to be the district s responsibility. This baseline should be created to yield and document information on the condition of the entire school. Sustainable goals and green building standards could be addressed in the planning process using the information produced by the inventory. Such would then lead to the determination of a framework of minimum work to produce a safe, serviceable building rebuilt/renewed in order to meet the instructional needs of the programs to be conducted in the facilities. Life cycle funding incentives need to be created within the new program to encourage districts to make the planning decisions inclusive of sustainable goals and green building standards. Conditions and standards need to be benchmarked with objective rather than subjective standards. Districts would provide building condition assessments with the master plans and educational specifications filed with the state agencies as part of applications for state planning approvals and funding.
5 The current School Facility Program under-serves students, schools and districts by its fundamental structure. Coupled with the demise of the Deferred Maintenance Program a one size fits all modernization program will continue to fail to meet the needs of California s schools. The UC Berkeley Report: Responses from the field An Analysis of the 8 Recommendations 1. Statewide master plan for K-12 infrastructure a. Revenue stream for ALL of education b. Master plan for education c. Equity needs to be insured d. State vision, local flexibility, performance oriented 2. State to actively promote local planning that advances quality education and sustainable communities. a. #1 quality education b. Support local intergovernmental collaboration 3. Assemble necessary information to prioritize funding for facilities with highest need. a. Agree with FCI inc. educational adequacy b. State funded inventory and assessment tool 4. CDE: Title 5 a. Broaden definition of learning space 5. Set priorities to fund with highest needs. a. State backstop; but need to demonstrate local effort. 6. State funding participant in capital renewals adjusted by local wealth & effort. a. Demonstrated need & effort b. Weighted formula on specific priorities 7. Multiple Revenue Sources a. Public/Private Partnership b. Capital cost = to last decade in funding yet shift towards modernization focus c. Remodel: Capital/Operation trade offs considered d. Flexible use of funds 8. SAB a. Check on viability of the program through and annual report b. More communication then added responsibility/agent
Duwayne Brooks Murdoch, Walrath & Holmes
overview of career technical education Duwayne Brooks Murdoch, Walrath & Holmes proposition 1D funding PROGRAM New Construction* Modernization* Charter Schools Joint-Use Program Career Technical Education
More informationThe School Facility Program
The School Facility Program The Office of Public School Construction Presented by Jeremy McCarroll, Travis Williams, and Brian LaPask July 21, 2009 School Facility Program (SFP) Composed of two main funding
More informationSchool Facility Program Handbook
Working together to improve the educational environment for California s children School Facility Program Handbook A guide to assist with applying for and obtaining grant funds State of California Arnold
More informationCalifornia Community Colleges
California Community Colleges Criteria for Prioritizing Capital Outlay Projects Introduction Recent history has shown there are insufficient state resources to pay for all of the community college facilities
More informationFunding Options in a Recovering Economy
Funding Options in a Recovering Economy Friday, December 3, 2010 4:00 pm 5:15 pm Tom Duffy, C.A.S.H. Lisa Kaplan, State Allocation Board Jeffrey Baratta, Piper Jaffray & Co. Cathy Allen, Western Placer
More informationUniversity of Missouri
Guidelines for Capital Reporting Including the FY 2018 Capital Plan FY 2019 Capital Appropriations Request and Higher Education Capital Fund Request Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Capital Plan Report
More informationCOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE 1 CCR BUILDING EXCELLENT SCHOOLS TODAY GRANT PROGRAM
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE 1 CCR 303-3 BUILDING EXCELLENT SCHOOLS TODAY GRANT PROGRAM Authority 22-43.7-106(2)(i)(I) C.R.S., the Public School
More informationLos Angeles Unified School District Page 1 of 5
Los Angeles Unified School District 333 South Beaudry Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Board of Education Report File #: Rep-341-15/16, Version: 1 Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution
More informationCounty School Facilities Consortium 2018 Annual Summit. Office of Public School Construction Update and Discussion
County School Facilities Consortium 2018 Annual Summit October 4-5, 2018 The Westin Sacramento 4800 Riverside Blvd Sacramento, CA Office of Public School Construction Update and Discussion Lisa Silverman
More informationSMART SCHOOLS INVESTMENT PLAN OVERVIEW This section is required to be completed prior to submitting any additional sections.
SMART SCHOOLS INVESTMENT PLAN OVERVIEW This section is required to be completed prior to submitting any additional sections. 1. All New York State public school districts are required to complete and submit
More informationLos Angeles Unified School District
Los Angeles Unified School District Bond Program Update Mark Hovatter Chief Facilities Executive Los Angeles Unified School District Construction Management Association of America School District Night
More informationBond Frequently Asked Questions
Bond Frequently Asked Questions Q: This Bond program totals $680 million. How does that compare with prior BSD Bond programs? A: The proposed 2014 Bond is quite comparable with recent Bond programs considering
More informationIssue Paper: Capital Outlay. Issue Paper: Capital Outlay
Issue Paper: Capital Outlay Issue Paper: Capital Outlay 7/27/2011 1 Georgia s K-12 Capital Outlay Program exists to assure that every public school student: is housed in a facility that is structurally
More informationExisting Site Issues & Site Certification. Presented By: Jim Bush President, School Site Solutions, Inc. (916)
Existing Site Issues & Site Certification Presented By: Jim Bush President, School Site Solutions, Inc. (916) 257-2530 Outline CDE Site Approval for Existing Sites CDE Site Certification CEQA / DTSC Facility
More informationDistrict Options in Maximizing Your Opportunity
Proposition 39: Saving Energy and Addressing Facility Improvements While Returning Money Back Into The Classroom District Options in Maximizing Your Opportunity Jeff Grabarek Director, Energy & Sustainability
More informationWeighted Student Formula
Weighted Student Formula Overview of the Concept: The Weighted Student Formula will be implemented in concert with the Governor s revenue initiative, which will provide an over $14 billion in funding increases
More informationMADISON CSD Smart Schools Investment Plan - HTS November 2016
SSIP Overview Page Last Modified: 12/06/2016 1. Please enter the name of the person to contact regarding this submission. Kurt Peavey 1a. Please enter their phone number for follow up questions. 3158931878
More informationThe Budget increases propose to fully-funding of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF).
January 10, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: Scott Day, Associate Executive Director Lori Easterling, Manager, Legislative Relations Jennifer Baker, Legislative Advocate Governor s Proposed 2018-19 Budget
More informationMADISON CSD Smart Schools Investment Plan -
SSIP Overview 1. Please enter the name of the person to contact regarding this submission. Kurt Peavey 1a. Please enter their phone number for follow up questions. 315-893-1878 1b. Please enter their e-mail
More informationFunding Principles. Years Passed New Revenue Credit Score Multiplier >3 years 0% % % % After Jan %
Funding Principles I. Infrastructure Incentives Initiative: encourages state, local and private investment in core infrastructure by providing incentives in the form of grants. Federal incentive funds
More information12. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE ELEMENT
12. Introduction The mission of the University of Florida Physical Plant Division and IFAS Facilities Operations is to maintain a physical environment conducive to teaching, learning and research at the
More informationSan Francisco Sheriff s Department Presentation To Community Corrections Partnership
City and County of San Francisco Department of Public Works HOJ Replacement Jail San Francisco Sheriff s Department Presentation To Community Corrections Partnership August 29, 2013 Agenda Hall of Justice
More informationCommunity Grant Guidelines
Community Grant Guidelines Updated November 2017 Program Goals The Community Grants Program is a broadly accessible, responsive statewide grants program. Its long-term goals are to strengthen the social
More informationBerkeley Progressive Alliance Candidate Questionnaire June 2018 Primary. Deadline for submitting completed questionnaires: Friday January 19, 2018
Berkeley Progressive Alliance Candidate Questionnaire June 2018 Primary Name: DAN KALB Address: 2625 Alcatraz Avenue, #219 Berkeley, CA 94705 E-mail: dankalbassembly15@gmail.com Phone (optional): 510-846-6018
More informationProposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017
Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017 David S. Cline Associate Superintendent for Finance and Support Services February 3, 2016 Budget Process and Virginia Law Virginia Code 22.1-92: Superintendent required
More informationSchool Board s Advertised Budget Fiscal Year 2017
School Board s Advertised Budget Fiscal Year 2017 Ryan Sawyers Chairman, PWC School Board Presented to Prince William Board of County Supervisors April 5, 2016 Major Budget Factors 1. Costs associated
More informationGeorgia Water Supply Competitive Grant Program Program Guidelines
Georgia Water Supply Competitive Grant Program Program Guidelines In March 008, the Georgia General Assembly approved and the Governor signed the amended state budget for Fiscal Year 008 (HB 989). The
More informationBallot Measures-J Section
J, Anaheim Elementary Schools Repair/Improvement Measure To repair and modernize classrooms and older neighborhood schools to support reading, math, science, technology, arts, replace deteriorating roofs,
More informationK-12 Categorical Reform
K-12 Categorical Reform E 61 K-12 Categorical Reform The state administers K-12 funding through more than 100 individual funding streams. Reform of the funding system would have several local benefits,
More informationVirginia Growth and Opportunity Fund (GO Fund) Grant Scoring Guidelines
Virginia Growth and Opportunity Fund (GO Fund) Grant Scoring Guidelines I. Introduction As provided in the Virginia Growth and Opportunity Act (the "Act"), funds are allocated, upon approval of the Virginia
More informationAESA Members FROM: Noelle Ellerson Ng, Director Federal Advocacy DATE: February 13, 2018 AESA Response to President Trump s Proposed FY18 Budget
TO: AESA Members FROM: Noelle Ellerson Ng, Director Federal Advocacy DATE: February 13, 2018 RE: AESA Response to President Trump s Proposed FY18 Budget Overview Money talks, and how you allocate money
More informationPurpose of Developer Fees. Developer Fees: An Overview of the Law and Recent Developments. Overview. September 19, Purpose of Developer Fees
Developer Fees: An Overview of the Law and Recent Developments September 19, 2017 Presented by: Harold M. Freiman Kelly M. Rem Overview Purpose of Developer Fees Types of Fees Accounting Requirements Replacement
More informationNOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement:
Interlocal Agreement Between the Board of County Commissioners of St. Johns County, Florida, City of St. Augustine, City of St. Augustine Beach, Town of Hastings and the School Board of St. Johns County,
More informationYPSILANTI DDA BUILDING REHABILITATION AND FAÇADE PROGRAM
YPSILANTI DDA BUILDING REHABILITATION AND FAÇADE PROGRAM Application Checklist Please provide information for the following items. Refer to Application Packet for description of requested materials. 1.
More informationLOCAL MEASURES FOR NOVEMBER 8, 2016 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
JURISDICTION COUNTY OF MEASURE (Letter) A B C D E F G MEASURE COUNTY ROAD REPAIR, TRANSIT, TRAFFIC RELIEF, SAFETY AND WATER QUALITY MEASURE Shall an ordinance be adopted to: repair roads, deteriorating
More informationOREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. DIVISION 27 School Construction Matching Program
OAR 581-027-0005 Definitions OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION 27 School Construction Matching Program The following definitions and abbreviations apply to rules within OAR 581, Div 27: (1) Adjusted
More informationJune 16, District Superintendents and Chief Business Officials. Don Gatti, Deputy Superintendent, Business Services
June 16, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District Superintendents and Chief Business Officials Don Gatti, Deputy Superintendent, Business Services 2016-17 May Revision Budget Guidelines Introduction This edition
More informationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the County of Los Angeles NOFA ROUND 23-A PERMANENT SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING INITIAL TERM SHEET
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the County of Los Angeles NOFA ROUND 23-A PERMANENT SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING INITIAL TERM SHEET In September 2017, the Community Development Commission of the County of
More informationALPINE COUNTY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
ALPINE COUNTY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES MASTER PLAN February 2018 Alpine County Unified School District School Board Members Clint Celio, President Amy Mecak, Clerk Rachael Brothers, Member Geoffrey
More informationPennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE) a. The October 17, 2013, Board meeting minutes state the following:
Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General Bureau of Special Performance Audits 302 Finance Building Harrisburg, PA 17120 717-787-2150 Information Request-10 Page 1 of 3 Requested of: For: Pennsylvania
More informationMANAGING RISK v. REWARD HOW TO BALANCE CREATIVE DESIGN WITH THE REALITIES OF PROJECT BUDGETS, SCHEDULES & SCOPE. Panel
MANAGING RISK v. REWARD HOW TO BALANCE CREATIVE DESIGN WITH THE REALITIES OF PROJECT BUDGETS, SCHEDULES & SCOPE 38 th Annual Conference on School Facilities Panel Moderator: Brian Whitmore, AIA, LEED AP
More informationLOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT BUILT ENVIRONMENT HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE POLICY
LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT BUILT ENVIRONMENT HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE POLICY I. GOAL - Encourage the preservation of the built historic, architectural and cultural resources within
More informationCSU CONSTRUCTION. The California State University Office of Audit and Advisory Services. California State University, East Bay
CSU The California State University Office of Audit and Advisory Services CONSTRUCTION California State University, East Bay Warren Hall Replacement Building Audit Report 16-10 August 15, 2016 EXECUTIVE
More informationPortland Public Schools
Public Hearing $ 790 Million General Obligation Bond Measure No. 26-193 Bonds to Improve Health, Safety, Learning by Modernizing, Repairing Schools (May 16, 2017 Special District Election) Date: April
More informationMINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE. Summary of Transfer Payments for the Operation of Public Hospitals. Type of Funding
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE 3.09 Institutional Health Program Transfer Payments to Public Hospitals The Public Hospitals Act provides the legislative authority to regulate and fund the operations
More informationRecorder Budget Unit 2705 Department Head: James Fitch, Elected
Recorder Budget Unit 2705 Department Head: James Fitch, Elected SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES APPROPRIATIONS: Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies Fixed Assets Other Financing Uses TOTAL
More informationThe State School Fund:
The State School Fund: Why It Matters to You The Twist Ending Michael Elliott State School Fund Coordinator Oregon Department of Education 503-947-5627 Michael.S.Elliott@state.or.us Introduction 1 History
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
LOW INCOME WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Contents GENERAL QUESTIONS... 1 PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY... 2 PROGRAM PROCESS... 3 PROJECT MEASURES, TIMELINE, AND CONSTRUCTION... 4 ENERGY EFFICENCY
More information2017 Rural Hospital Capital Improvement Grant Program Final Application Guidelines
2017 Rural Hospital Capital Improvement Grant Program Final Application Guidelines Minnesota Department of Health Office of Rural Health & Primary Care The purpose of this document is to assist you in
More informationTransportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review
Fiscal Research Division Hiighway Fund and Hiighway Trust Fund Secondary Roads Program Transportation Justification Review March 24, 2007 The General Assembly should eliminate or reduce funding for the
More informationThe President s Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Overview
The President s Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Overview The President s Fiscal Year 2014 Budget demonstrates that we can make critical investments to strengthen the middle class, create jobs, and grow the economy
More informationSMART SCHOOLS BOND ACT LEGISLATION (excerpt from Chapter 57, Laws of 2014)
51 PART B 52 Section 1. The smart schools bond act of 2014 is enacted to read as 53 follows: S. 6356--D 32 A. 8556--D 1 SMART SCHOOLS BOND ACT OF 2014 2 Section 1. Short title. 3 2. Creation of a state
More informationPresident s Update - April Strategic Plan
President s Update - April 2018 Strategic Plan Strategic Initiatives Discovery & Innovation in a Learning-centred Environment Intercultural Learning Institutional Sustainability 1 2 3 Discovery & Innovation
More informationCHAPTER House Bill No. 5013
CHAPTER 2009-89 House Bill No. 5013 An act relating to transportation; amending s. 334.044, F.S.; revising the powers and duties of the Department of Transportation to provide for certain environmental
More informationAboriginal Community Capital Grants Program Guide
APPLICATION GUIDE FOR THE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY CAPITAL GRANTS PROGRAM WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE YOU APPLY Before completing your Aboriginal Community Capital Grants Program application, please read
More informationPublic Private Partnerships: An American Priority
Public Private Partnerships: An American Priority Mark Strauss, Sr. VP of Corporate Strategy & Business Development, American Water NAWC Southeast Water Infrastructure Summit Charleston, SC April 30, 2015
More informationLong Beach Unified School District Measure K Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee 2015 Annual Report. April 7, 2016
Long Beach Unified School District Measure K Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee 2015 Annual Report April 7, 2016 To the Board of Education and residents of the Long Beach Unified School District: The Measure
More information21 HARDSHIP, FACILITIES AND AUTISM/DYSLEXIA GRANT IMPLEMENTATION
House Bill 21 HARDSHIP, FACILITIES AND AUTISM/DYSLEXIA GRANT IMPLEMENTATION HOUSE PUBLIC EDUCATION COMMITTEE, APRIL 18, 2018 Brackenridge HS, San Antonio TX Financial Hardship Transition Program 4/19/18
More informationHigher Education includes the University of California (UC), the California State
Higher Education Higher Education includes the University of California (UC), the California State University (CSU), the California Community Colleges (CCC), the Student Aid Commission and several other
More informationC.A.S.H. High Performance Schools Committee
C.A.S.H. High Performance Schools Committee February 7, 2007 Cesar E. Chavez Education Center (Oakland USD) Courtesy of VBN Architects Photograph by Michael Bruk High Performance Schools Getting Started
More informationEducation, Department of. Project Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) Governor s Planning Estimates. Governor s Rec. Agency Request
Project Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) Agency Request Governor s Rec Governor s Planning Estimates Project Title Agency Funding Priority Source 2006 2008 2010 2006 2008 2010 Nett Lake Facility Construction
More information12.0 Facilities Maintenance
12.0 Facilities Maintenance GOAL 1: TO MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE A PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT CONDUCIVE TO TEACHING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH IN A WAY THAT IS SUSTAINABLE, EFFICIENT, AND PROTECTS THE UNIVERSITY S CAPITAL
More informationInterim Report of the Portfolio Review Group University of California Systemwide Research Portfolio Alignment Assessment
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Interim Report of the Portfolio Review Group 2012 2013 University of California Systemwide Research Portfolio Alignment Assessment 6/13/2013 Contents Letter to the Vice President...
More informationRequest for Proposals Architectural Services Re: Fremont High School (RFP No date advertised July 17, 2014) ADDENDUM No. 2 (AUGUST 7, 2014)
Request for Proposals Architectural Services Re: Fremont High School (RFP No. 13158 date advertised July 17, 2014) ADDENDUM No. 2 (AUGUST 7, 2014) The following changes, additions, modifications and corrections
More informationDISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
F4 Office of the President TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: For the Meeting of DISCUSSION ITEM UPDATE ON THE 2020 PROJECT, MERCED CAMPUS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Twenty years ago, the Regents of the
More informationDAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND MEASURE FULL BALLOT TEXT
DAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND MEASURE FULL BALLOT TEXT By approval of this measure by at least fifty-five percent (55%) of the registered voters voting thereon, the Davis Joint Unified School
More informationSANTA ROSA CITY SCHOOLS DISTRICT. 211 Ridgway Avenue Santa Rosa, CA Request for Proposals For Architectural Services
SANTA ROSA CITY SCHOOLS DISTRICT 211 Ridgway Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Request for Proposals For Architectural Services Request for Proposals Issued: March 9, 2016 Deadline for Submittal of Responses:
More informationNORTH CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. A. Robert Kucab Executive Director
A. Robert Kucab Executive Director LEGISLATIVE OVERVIEW for JOINT APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT LEGISLATIVE OVERVIEW Table of Contents (Page Numbers) North Carolina Housing Finance
More informationThe Historic Preservation Plan
The Historic Preservation Plan INTENT AND PURPOSE The purpose of the Historical Preservation Chapter is to provide the comprehensive plan foundation for the protection and enhancement of the City of Sarasota
More informationState Education Finance Study Commission Issue Paper: Capital Outlay
1 I. Issue Capital Outlay As stated in the Official Code of Georgia (OCGA 20-2-260(a)), the purpose of the state s capital outlay program is to assure that every public school student is housed in a facility
More informationLocal Control Funding Formula Spending Regulations Comparison and Feedback Response Chart
Page 1 of 11 Local Control Funding Formula Spending Comparison and Response Chart Overview At the November 6-7, 2013, State Board of Education (SBE) meeting, Agenda Item 13 presented a preliminary draft
More informationCOMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
NORTH PLATTE, NEBRASKA COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM "Renewing the North Platte Quality Growth Fund" 2011-2021 Mayor: City Council: City Administrator: City Attorney: Mr. Marc Kaschke Mr. Larry
More informationPositioning Your Research, Infrastructure, and Education Activities to Take Advantage of the Programs in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
1341 G Street, NW Eighth Floor Washington, DC 20005 t: 202.289.7475 f: 202.289.7454 www.lewis-burke.com Positioning Your Research, Infrastructure, and Education Activities to Take Advantage of the Programs
More informationAlamosa - New Elementary School
Alamosa - New Elementary School CDE s Statewide Goals BEST Program Students Educators Schools / Districts State Successful Students Great Teachers and Leaders Outstanding Schools and Districts Best Education
More informationState Board of Education Fixed Capital Outlay Legislative Budget Request
State Board of Education 2011-12 Fixed Capital Outlay Legislative Budget Request Florida K-20 Education System September 21, 2010 Green Book Page # EDUCATION BUDGET Expenditure Detail Legislative Budget
More informationWhat s Inside... January 2013
January 2013 School Energy NewsWire A Newsletter for Efficient & Climate Friendly Schools School Energy Coalition Recommendations in Governor s Proposed State Budget We are extremely pleased to report
More informationNotice of Credit and Funds Availability and Request for Proposals For High Cost Medicaid Populations
ANDREW M. CUOMO Governor DARRYL C. TOWNS Commissioner/CEO Notice of Credit and Funds Availability and Request for Proposals For High Cost Medicaid Populations New York State Homes & Community Renewal Housing
More informationEFFECTIVE DATE: June 15, 2004, unless a later date is cited at the end of a section. [ NMAC - Rp,
TITLE 6 CHAPTER 27 PART 3 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY COUNCIL APPLICATION AND GRANT ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANS 6.27.3.1
More informationIllinois Education Funding Recommendations
Illinois Education Funding Recommendations A Report Submitted to the Illinois General Assembly by the Education Funding Advisory Board January 2017 Recommendation EFAB Recommendation for Fiscal Year 2018
More informationProject/Program Profile
Project/Program Profile Name: (BoLA) Organization: Little Tokyo Service Center Community Development Corporation (Little Tokyo Service Center CDC) Location of Project/Program: 237-249 S. Los Angeles Street,
More informationGeneral Qs and As for Applicants. Low Carbon Building Skills Training Fund Apprenticeship Enhancement Fund Stream
Q1. Why was the Low Carbon Building Skills initiative launched? A1. The purpose of this initiative is to improve training, and workforce and technical capacity to ensure that Ontario s workers have the
More informationLouisiana Department of Education. High Cost Services Allocation School Year John White State Superintendent of Education
Louisiana Department of Education High Cost Services Allocation School Year 2017-2018 John White State Superintendent of Education Introduction The Louisiana Department of Education (LDE) has established
More informationFlorida State Board of Education
Florida State Board of Education 2016-17 Proposed Education Budget Request August 26, 2015 Gainesville, Florida 2016-17 Education Legislative Budget Request Priorities FEFP Historic Funding Levels $20.2
More informationCal Poly Pomona Request for Clarification for Lanterman Development Center Land Development Consultant RFC
Cal Poly Pomona Request for Clarification for Lanterman Development Center Land Development Consultant RFC 16-006 A. INTRODUCTION California State Polytechnic University, Pomona ( Cal Poly Pomona ), is
More informationLos Angeles Community College District. Report on Audited Basic Financial Statements
Los Angeles Community College District Report on Audited Basic Financial Statements June 30, 2006 June 30, 2006 Los Angeles County, California: East Los Angeles College Los Angeles City College Los Angeles
More informationSUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014
SUMMARY OF THE ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) submitted the Generating Renewal, Opportunity, and Work with Accelerated Mobility, Efficiency,
More informationSan Dieguito Union High School District
San Dieguito Union High School District INFORMATION REGARDING BOARD AGENDA ITEM Board Workshop Correspondence, 03-10-16 1 of 27 TO: BOARD OF TRUSTEES DATE OF REPORT: March 4, 2016 BOARD MEETING DATE: March
More informationCustomer Guide. Colorado Historic Preservation Income Tax Credit
Colorado Historic Preservation Income Tax Credit Overview of Residential Program (CRS 39-22-514.5 of 2014, as amended) Colorado offers a state income tax credit for preservation and rehabilitation work
More informationWater Trust Board 2019 Application Overview and Frequently Asked Questions
Water Trust Board 2019 Application Overview and Frequently Asked Questions The New Mexico Finance Authority ( NMFA ) administers the application process on behalf of the Water Trust Board ( WTB ). For
More informationStrategic Investment Program
Policy Update Needed Suzanne Flynn Multnomah County Auditor Audit Staff Janis Koch, Senior Management Auditor Mark Ulanowicz, Senior Management Auditor Suzanne Flynn, Multnomah County Auditor 501 S.E.
More informationAppendix H Sample Partnership Policy
Appendix H Sample Partnership Policy 231 Appendix H Sample Partnership Policy and Proposal Format Created By: 3050 Industrial Lane, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO 80020 303-439-8369 Fax: 303-439-0628 Toll Free:
More informationFinance & Audit Committee Meeting. First Quarter Fiscal Year 2018 October 25, 2017
Finance & Audit Committee Meeting First Quarter Fiscal Year 2018 October 25, 2017 Office of Internal Audit & Compliance Update Page 2 Central Office Audit Highlights Payroll Objectives To evaluate the
More informationN.J.A.C. 6A:26, EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS
N.J.A.C. 6A:26, EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 6A:26-1.1 Purpose and applicability of rules 6A:26-1.2 Definitions SUBCHAPTER 2. LONG-RANGE FACILITIES PLANS 6A:26-2.1
More informationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the County of Los Angeles NOFA ROUND 23-B PERMANENT SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING TERM SHEET
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the County of Los Angeles NOFA ROUND 23-B PERMANENT SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING TERM SHEET On January 30, 2018, the Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles
More informationSpecial State Funding Programs Breakout Session #5C Funding Programs Track. October 25, 2012
Special State Funding Programs Breakout Session #5C Funding Programs Track October 25, 2012 SPECIAL STATE FUNDING PROGRAMS - REVENUE SHARING Debbi Webb-Howells Revenue Sharing Program Manager Local Assistance
More informationAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) ` R. Brooks Garber Director, Federal Policy National Alliance for Public Charter Schools www.publiccharters.org March 2009 ARRA $787 Billion In Investments
More informationBaltimore City Public Schools 10-Year Buildings Plan: Implementation Strategy
1 Baltimore City Public Schools 10-Year Buildings Plan: Implementation Strategy January 17, 2013 DRAFT Every day we all parents, teachers, community leaders tell our students that their education is the
More information16.01 FACILITIES SERVICES POLICY Cabinet Approval: 09/25/03 CHAPTER 2 Board of Trustees Approval: 10/08/03 POLICY 16.01
16.01 FACILITIES SERVICES POLICY Cabinet Approval: 09/25/03 Board of Trustees Approval: 10/08/03 POLICY 16.01 I. PURPOSE To describe the Facilities Services functions and responsibilities and define services
More informationTGIF: The Green Initiative Fund
TGIF: The Green Initiative Fund A Functional Overview for UC Berkeley, Spring 2007 Based on the Referendum Contract language and the Bylaws of TGIF A fund with a mission If passed by the students of UC
More informationBYLAWS OF THE GREEN INITIATIVE FUND MISSION STATEMENT
BYLAWS OF THE GREEN INITIATIVE FUND MISSION STATEMENT The Green Initiative Fund (TGIF) provides funding for projects that reduce the UC Berkeley s negative impact on the environment and make UC Berkeley
More information