OTO Response to U.S. DOT and MoDOT Comments on FY TIP

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "OTO Response to U.S. DOT and MoDOT Comments on FY TIP"

Transcription

1 OTO to U.S. DOT and MoDOT Comments on FY TIP Comments with remaining questions are highlighted in grey with a draft response and/or question in green. MoDOT is working to help provide answers on these questions. FTA Comments 1. Page A-i, Paragraph 2 Recommend adding the TIP is a programmed effort used to carry out the goals and vision of the region's Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Added wording to the first line of the second paragraph, The TIP is a financially constrained fouryear program outlining the most immediate implementation priorities for area transportation projects, carrying out the goals and vision of Journey 2035, the OTO s long range transportation plan. 2. Page A-ii Recommend using "urbanized area" if the city limits differ from the developed portion of the region. Added a second map showing the urbanized area. 3. Page A-v, Last Paragraph Generally an equity analysis is conducted also. Added wording to make mention of equity analysis, A public hearing is required, and an equity analysis may also be performed, prior to implementing either an increase in transit fares or a significant reduction in service. 4. Page A-vii, 2 nd Complete Paragraph Is the region's MTP considered? If so, it should be noted. Added wording to indicate consideration of MPO priorities and the long range transportation plan, These factors may include the MPO s and RPC s prioritized lists, public comment and priority time necessary to produce plans and estimated costs, as well as the recommendations of the long range transportation plan, safety factors, traffic information, condition ratings, construction scheduling and sequencing, duration of the construction, coordination with other construction projects (both MoDOT s and others), economic development, and the availability of outside funding sources. 5. Page H-ii Please communicate why OTO predicts declining revenues available for the area ( e.g. depleted Highway Trust Fund). OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 1 of July 2014

2 Added wording indicating reasons behind declining revenues, The table below indicates the total amount of federal and state funding that MoDOT has projected as available for the OTO area in the STIP. Federal funding is shown as declining over the next four years due to declining revenues from the Highway Trust Fund, as well as MoDOT s declining ability to match federal funds, due to a decrease in projected state revenue. This table does not include OTO sub-allocated federal funding, such as STP-Urban, BRM, or Enhancement. Transit funding includes all formula funding distributed to the Springfield, MO area for FTA Sections 5307, 5310, and 5339 funding. FHWA Comments 1. Page A-I, Last Paragraph The status of the projects is greater than just being eligible for implementation. The TIP presents a list of projects that the MPO has selected to be delivered over the TIP horizon period. Please consider revising the last sentence as follows: The projects in the TIP represent the agreed list of projects eligible for implementation that are programmed to be delivered in each year of the four year TIP horizon period. Done 2. Page A-vii, Transportation Plan Compliance Paragraph 1 Please consider referring to the LRTP as the Long Range Transportation Plan, Journey 2035 approved by the OTO Board of Directors on December 15, Added Journey 2035 after Long Range Transportation Plan. 3. Page A-vii, Transportation Plan Compliance Paragraph 1 Please consider replacing the word improvements with the word projects. Done 4. Pages B-i through B-xii The status of several projects (EN1302, EN1305, EN1306, EN1307) programmed in FY2014 are not documented. The cited four projects have been carried over to FY2015. Please reconcile to the extent needed. As these projects are reprogrammed, they are not included in the status pages. The status pages only include those projects that are not reprogrammed or marked as complete from the prior TIP. Added wording to the top of page B-i stating such, The tables below show the status of projects OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 2 of July 2014

3 that were either not reprogrammed or marked as complete in the prior Transportation Improvement Program. 5. Pages B-i through B-xii The TIP # GR 1312 Bridge Replacement, Bridge # On Farm Road 102 project is programmed in FY2014 of the current TIP. It is being carried over into FY2015 of the updated TIP. Why is this project not shown in the status tables for Greene County projects? As stated above, reprogrammed projects are not included in the status pages. 6. Miscellaneous A very informative Project Description Key was developed by OTO and incorporated into the FY TIP. Please consider inserting this one page information index into the beginning of Sections D-F. OTO will include this for the final draft TIP. 7. Section D: Roadways Program Please consider grouping all MoDOT & LPA scoping projects together. Projects are ordered by their TIP number, which is assigned according to the location (if specific) and timing of the project. 8. Section D: Roadways Program The TIP#CC1110 project (Pg. E4) is MoDOT project #8P2356 that is shown as having local funding the FY STIP. Should there be local funding shown in the TIP project table? Local funding has been added and the other programmed amounts adjusted accordingly. 9. Section D: Roadways Program TIP # GR1010 project (Pg. E5) is MoDOT project #8P0683D that is showing a partial AC programmed construction project in FY2015 as well as an AC conversion in FY2015. Is it correct to show AC year of conversion as FY2015? Same question for the following MoDOT AC projects programmed for award in STIP FY2015: TIP #MO1408 / 8P3010 TIP #MO1409 / 8P3011 TIP #SP1315 / 8P2264C TIP #SP1316 / 8P3005 TIP #SP1318 / 8P3002 TIP #SP1323 / 8P3019 TIP #SP1408 / 8S0690B TIP #SP1411 / 8S3034 TIP #SP1501 / 8P3035B OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 3 of July 2014

4 It looks like these are projects with MoDOT-AC and an anticipated year of conversion of FY 2015, so yes, it is correct to show FY 2015 as the year of conversion. 10. Section D: Roadways Program I am unable to locate in the FY STIP. Please reconcile. TIP # MO1405 (MoDOT project # 8P3027) TIP # MO1501 (MoDOT project # 8P2279) TIP # MO1601 (MoDOT project # 8P2277) TIP # MO1603 (MoDOT project # 8Q3000) TIP # MO1701 (MoDOT project # 8Q3001) TIP # MO1705 (MoDOT project # 8Q3009) TIP # MO1801 (MoDOT project # 8Q3009) TIP # SP1416 (MoDOT project # 8P30419) TIP # MO1405 (MoDOT project # 8P3027), Surveying for Excess ROW This is in there, changed programmed amount to match. TIP # MO1501 (MoDOT project # 8P2279), Annual On-Call Work Zone Enforcement I found this one TIP # MO1601 (MoDOT project # 8P2277), Annual On-Call Work Zone Enforcement This one is not labeled with the TIP number in the STIP (It should be 8P2377). TIP # MO1603 (MoDOT project # 8Q3000), ITS I found this one TIP # MO1701 (MoDOT project # 8Q3001), ITS This one is not labeled with the TIP number in the STIP. TIP # MO1705 (MoDOT project # 8Q3009), Annual Guardrail and Guard Cable All of the guardrail projects were listed as MO1150, but now have the right TIP Numbers. TIP # MO1801 (MoDOT project # 8Q3009), ITS This one is not in the STIP yet, but it was programmed fully in the TIP, as Springfield was programming their share. TIP # SP1416 (MoDOT project # 8P30419), Glenstone and Pythian This is in the Design and Scoping section of the STIP. 11. Section D: Roadways Program Why is the STIP# 8P2219 shown for TIP# NX0906 project that appears to be a Nixa sponsored project? I am unable to located the 8P2219 project in the STIP. Please reconcile. This is a cost share project between Nixa and the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission. When I look at the draft STIP online, 8P2219 is shown for this project. OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 4 of July 2014

5 12. Section D: Roadways Program TIP #SP1323 / 8P3019 The Federal dollar amount in the table ($681,000) is different than the Federal dollar amount in the notes ($728,721). The Federal dollar amount shown in the STIP is $728,721. Please reconcile. The $728,721 includes the STP-Urban programmed for ROW ($47,000) in FY 2015 and the STP-Urban programmed for Construction ($681,000) in FY Section D: Roadways Program TIP #SP1323 / 8S0690B This is shown in the tables as a state funded AC project. However, the notes indicate that there is both local and Federal funding involved with this project. Is it correct to show all state funding for this FY2015 programmed project? This project is a combination of local, STP-Urban, MoDOT, and MoDOT-AC funding. The funding shown with MoDOT-AC indicates the funding amount that is eligible for advance construction conversion to federal funding in the future. 14. Section D: Roadways Program TIP #SP1410 / 8P0605 The FY2015 cost and the total cost shown in the TIP & STIP are not the same. Please reconcile. FY 2015 in the TIP shows $140,000 MoDOT and $160,000 MoDOT AC for $300k total, while the STIP shows $200k. FY 2016 match between the TIP and STIP. This has been corrected to put $40,000 MoDOT in FY 2015, instead of $140, Section D: Roadways Program The following MoDOT projects shown in the FY STIP do not appear to be shown in the OTO FY TIP. Please reconcile 8P2219, 8P2356, 8S2267, 7S3041, 8P2264D, 8S3025, 0I300M, 8P0683D, 8P3006, 8S3026, 8U0500, 8P3035C, 0P3011I, 8P P2219 This is programmed as NX0906 8P2356 This is programmed as CC1110 8S2267 This is programmed as MO1206 7S3041 This is programmed as GR1402 8P2264D (SP1317) Programmed in STIP following start of STIP Fiscal Year, but before start of TIP Fiscal Year 8S3025 This is programmed as SP1412 in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Section 0I3001M This is programmed as MO1504 8P0683D This is programmed as GR1010 OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 5 of July 2014

6 8P3006 (GR1304) Programmed in STIP following start of STIP Fiscal Year, but before start of TIP Fiscal Year 8S3026 Programmed as SP1414 in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Section 8U0500 (SP1108) Programmed in STIP following start of STIP Fiscal Year, but before start of TIP Fiscal Year 8P3035C This is programmed as EN1502 in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Section 0P3011I This is programmed as EN1601 in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Section 8P3009 This is programmed as MO Section F: Advance Construction The MoDOT STIP does not show the programming of project specific AC conversion actions. Instead, MoDOT shows a lump sum amount of anticipated Federal revenue that they plan to use to convert AC projects during each program year of the STIP horizon period. The programming of specific MoDOT AC projects for conversion in the OTO TIP is inconsistent with the lump sum programming approach used by MoDOT in the STIP. Please consider discontinuing the practice of including this AC conversion section in the OTO TIP. OTO will remove the individual Advance Construction project listings. Instead a table similar to that shown in Section H, as well as the background information on Advance Construction will be moved to the text of the Roadways Section. This will be complete for the final draft. 17. Section H: Financial UPFRONT Great job of documenting the anticipated available Federal, state and local revenue over the TIP horizon period. Thank you. 18. Page H-i, Paragraph 6 MoDOT Revenue The statement that reads, since state fiscal year 2007, projects on a statewide basis have been awarded from 7-13% less than the programmed amount, is outdated and likely no longer accurate. Please confirm with MoDOT and revise as needed. This is explained further in the paragraph, Since State Fiscal Year 2007, projects on a statewide basis have been awarded from seven to 13 percent less than the programmed amount. Every year, awards continue to be less than the programmed amounts and projects are being completed for less than programmed amounts, which allows for more savings during the construction phase of projects. MoDOT s newest STIP, , however, does not include adjustments for anticipated award savings as past STIPs have. This savings pattern has not continued for projects awarded in OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 6 of July 2014

7 2014. State Fiscal Years 2018 and 2019 have been purposefully under programmed in order to accommodate unforeseen changes. 19. Pages H-iii and H-iv Federal and State Revenue Sources The narrative about MoDOT revenue is identical to the narrative presented in the current TIP. The MoDOT revenue amounts estimated for the FY STIP are different than the revenue amounts estimated in the current STIP. Please make sure that the percentages shown for each specific MoDOT revenue source, as part of the total amount of MoDOT transportation revenue, mirrors the percentages shown in the MoDOT FY STIP Section Five. The Federal and State Revenue section was updated to reflect the information found in the FY STIP. 20. Tables H.5 and H.6 Projected Revenues The OTO has chosen to not use an inflation factor when estimating available local revenue presented in tables H.5 & H.6. While at the same time it is noted that the estimated anticipated local revenue for FY2015 is 1% - 4% greater than the total local revenue estimated for FY2015 in the current FY TIP. The changes from the FY TIP and the FY TIP are because future years are based on current revenue receipts. The local jurisdictions have experienced an increase in the amount of revenues reflected, but with the still changing economic environment, staff thought it was important to still be cautious when projecting revenue. 21. Page H-vii Please update the second to last sentence, regarding the average number of days between bid award and conversion, to show 196 days. Recommend removing reference to the first quarter fiscal year Done 22. Page H-vii Please update the last sentence to show the reference to the FY Done OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 7 of July 2014

8 23. Pages H-vii and H-viii Please take steps to obtain current MoDOT O&M cost information based on the MoDOT Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request. This has been requested and this information was the most recent OTO was provided. 24. Table H.8 Greene County maintains, by a very wide margin, the second largest amount of Federal-aid system road miles ( ) of any LPA in the Springfield MPA. Consideration should be given to showing Greene County as a stand-alone jurisdiction in Table H.8. As stated in submission of Draft TIP to FHWA, this table was waiting for updated information. Christian County Mileage has been added and shown separately from Greene County. Table H.8 Number of Lane Miles on Federal- Aid System Cost per Mile FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 State System MoDOT $6,500 $6,525,006 $6,655,506 $6,788,616 $6,924,388 Non-State System Battlefield $469 $3,731 $3,806 $3,882 $3,960 Nixa $2530 $25,424 $25,932 $26,451 $26,980 Ozark $8500 $60,512 $61,722 $62,956 $64,215 Republic $1212 $36,355 $37,082 $37,824 $38,580 Springfield $6172 $2,325,881 $2,372,399 $2,419,847 $2,468,244 Willard $1626 $13,948 $14,227 $14,512 $14,802 Christian County $1057 $40,163 $40,966 $41,785 $42,621 Greene County $1057 $106,796 $108,932 $111,111 $113,333 TOTAL $2,612,810 $2,665,066 $2,718,368 $2,772, Table H.8 Consideration should be given to including a note at the bottom of Table H.8 that states that Christian County does not own any Federal-aid system roadway. This is not an accurate statement. Please see response to Comment 24 above. OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 8 of July 2014

9 26. Table H.8 (renamed to H.9) This continues to do a great job of delivering a windshield view of the demonstration of fiscal constraint for the LPAs that have programmed projects in the FY TIP. Thank you. 27. Table H.10 Please document the inflation factor reflected in the O&M costs over the TIP horizon period. The following information was added, Estimated costs have been tracking with inflation, though depreciation and administrative costs are expected to increase, partially due to the completion of the transfer facility. Inflation rates range from 2.50 percent to 3.50 percent over the timeline of the TIP. Similar inflation factors were applied to the revenue as well. 28. Table H.11 Please document the inflation factor reflected in the estimated revenue for transit O&M over the TIP horizon period. As above, the following information was added, Estimated costs have been tracking with inflation, though depreciation and administrative costs are expected to increase, partially due to the completion of the transfer facility. Inflation rates range from 2.50 percent to 3.50 percent over the timeline of the TIP. Similar inflation factors were applied to the revenue as well. 29. Table H.11 Please explain how it is possible that the projected available transit revenue is equal to the estimated transit expenses for each of the four years of the TIP horizon period. (NOTE: Is it accurate to recognize the annual CU utility revenue amount as a type of subsidy that offsets the difference between available revenue generated by the other four available funding sources and the estimated annual cost to operate the transit system?) The City Utility Revenue is a subsidy that offsets the difference between available revenue generated by the other four available funding sources and the estimated annual cost to operate the transit system. 30. Page H-9 The middle table on page H-9 shows a running TOTAL REMAINING amount of State and Federal Funding after all programming is considered for each program year. The following calculation can be confusing to a reader: OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 9 of July 2014

10 FY 2015 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING $39,498,707 Programmed State & Federal Funding ($51,664,813) TOTAL REMAINING $37,013, 983 This confusion is possible because the calculation does show the inclusion of the Prior Year TOTAL REMAINING balance amount of $49,180,089 in the TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING amount. Consideration should be given to showing the available Prior Year funding amounts at the top of each FY column. If shown in this manner, the Programmed State & Federal Funding amount would be subtracted from the combined total of prior year available but unobligated/programmed funding & FY2015 estimated revenue. FY 2015 Prior Year Funding $49,180,089 Available FY2015 Funding (+) $39,498,707 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING $88,678,796 Programmed State & Federal Funding (-) ($51,664,813) TOTAL REMAINING $37,013, 983 We have added a Prior Year Funding row to the table. MoDOT Comments The following projects have different total cost amounts in the Draft TIP compared to the Draft STIP. Frank Miller has provided further information in blue text regarding the cost differences. 1. Section D: Roadways Program 7S3041 (TIP-$3,035,000; STIP-$2,943,000) Because of FY overlap, we double-programmed some preliminary engineering. FY 2015 PE in the TIP should be reduced by $92,000 because it was programmed in FY 2014 TIP but FY 2015 STIP. This is GR1402, Route 125 Railroad Crossing. The funding amounts have been adjusted in the TIP. 2. Section D: Roadways Program 8P3011 (TIP-$1,657,200; STIP-$1,658,000) MoDOT (State) construction cost should be $309,800 in the TIP. This is MO1409, West Bypass Pavement Improvements. The amount was changed to reflect the above comment. OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 10 of July 2014

11 3. Section D: Roadways Program 8P2219 (TIP-$3,519,751; STIP-$3,522,000) Previously-programmed amount in the TIP missed either $2,000 of PE from 2013 or It should be $24,000 prior programmed (and the remaining difference is due to rounding). This is NX0906, Route 160 and 14 Intersection. Added $2,000 to the prior funding, bringing the total to $3,521, Section D: Roadways Program 8P0683E (TIP-$212,000; STIP-$302,000) Previously-programmed amount in the TIP is missing $90,000 from prior to It should be $294,000 previously-programmed. This is RG0901, Scoping for Interchange at Route 60 and Route 125. Additional funding was added to the previously programmed amount. 5. Section D: Roadways Program 8P0605G (TIP-$9,467,000; STIP-$9,367,000) We made an error on the PE. It should be MoDOT ENG of $40,000 in FY 2015 and MoDOT-AC ENG of $160,000 in FY This is SP1410, Route 65 Pavement Improvements. Changed 2015 MoDOT Engineering to be $40,000 instead of $140, Section D: Roadways Program 8P0850B (TIP-$2,924,401; STIP-$2,926,000) Error on MoDOT-AC ENG in FY 2016 should be $1,600, not $1. This is SP1106, Eastgate Avenue Relocation. Changed 2016 MoDOT-AC Engineering to be $1,600 instead of $1. 7. Section D: Roadways Program 8P2196 (TIP-$14,978,871; STIP-$15,067,000) Need multiple corrections on this one will provide later. Funding amounts were changed in TIP to reconcile differences. OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 11 of July 2014

12 8. Section D: Roadways Program 8S0690B (TIP-$2,424,000; STIP-$2,469,000) There was an error in FY $45,000 of ROW Incidentals were not programmed in the TIP. Total MoDOT Engineering for 2014 should have been $225,000. This is SP1408, Campbell and Plainview Phase 3. We will be making an Administrative Modification to FY TIP to correct for the increased engineering. 9. Section D: Roadways Program 8Q3001 This appears to be a duplicate project with different dollar amounts (TIP-$1,038,000; STIP- $673,000) The TIP includes the City of Springfield s portion which is not included in the STIP. The STIP only shows the MoDOT portion, whereas the TIP is more comprehensive. MO1801 does not have a STIP number yet. 10. Section D: Roadways Program 8Q3000 (TIP-$1,028,000; STIP-$673,000) ditto This is MO1603, ITS Operations and Management. The TIP includes City of Springfield funding. 11. Section D: Roadways Program 8Q2248 (TIP-$1,018,000; STIP-$673,000) ditto This is MO1503, ITS Operations and Management. The TIP includes City of Springfield funding. OTO Reponse to TIP Comments Page 12 of July 2014

Transportation Improvement Program

Transportation Improvement Program OTO FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program Approved by the Board of Directors 8/18/2016 Approved by U.S. DOT 9/30/2016 INTRODUCTION SECTION A INTRODUCTION OTO MPA BOUNDARY MAP OTO URBANIZED

More information

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 18, :00-1:30 PM OTO CONFERENCE ROOM, SUITE W. CHESTERFIELD BLVD.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 18, :00-1:30 PM OTO CONFERENCE ROOM, SUITE W. CHESTERFIELD BLVD. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA AUGUST 18, 2016 12:00-1:30 PM OTO CONFERENCE ROOM, SUITE 101 2208 W. CHESTERFIELD BLVD., SPRINGFIELD OZARKS TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATION A METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

More information

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Sub-allocated Funding Process and Application Package This packet includes information and guidance about the process used by KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission to

More information

Understanding the. Program

Understanding the. Program Understanding the Transportation Improvement Program Aka: TIP 101 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Federally Mandated for all MPO s by USDOT Short Range (no more than four years) All federally

More information

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016) Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year (July 1, 2015 June 30, ) APPROVED BY OTO BOARD OF DIRECTORS: April 16, 2015 APPROVED BY USDOT: April 22, 2015 AMENDMENT ONE APPROVED BY OTO BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

More information

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon Every profession has its own acronyms and jargon. The shorthand wording makes it easier and quicker for professionals in any given field to communicate

More information

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017 2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017 What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)? Long-range transportation plan for the region Required under state and

More information

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects This document is available in accessible formats when requested five days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization and is prepared in cooperation

More information

Amendments to the 2040 Total Mobility Plan of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

Amendments to the 2040 Total Mobility Plan of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Amendments to the 2040 Total Mobility Plan of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization May 2018 The CORE MPO s current Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), CORE Connections 2040 Total Mobility

More information

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program Introduction 1.1 Metropolitan Area Planning Agency Overview The Omaha-Council Bluffs Metropolitan Area Planning Agency (MAPA) is a voluntary

More information

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

FFY Transportation Improvement Program Lawton Metropolitan Planning Organization DRAFT FFY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program Approved, 2017 The Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated

More information

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT FY 2013-2016 STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT HIGHWAY May 2013 Approved 4/08/2013 FYs 2013-2016 TIP Amendment Project Description 1 2 3 4 5 6

More information

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region A Guide to Transportation Decision Making In the Kansas City region 2 Guide to Transportation Decision Making Table of Contents Purpose of guide...4 MARC s planning role...5 What is transportation decision

More information

Transportation Improvement Program FY

Transportation Improvement Program FY Transportation Improvement Program FY 2016-2021 (Page intentionally left blank) OMAHA-COUNCIL BLUFFS METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY RESOLUTION NUMBER 2015-16 WHEREAS, the members of the Omaha-Council

More information

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY AMARILLO DISTRICT. AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY AMARILLO DISTRICT. AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 AMARILLO DISTRICT AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions 8-01-2009 MINUTES AMARILLO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

More information

Formal STIP Amendment

Formal STIP Amendment FHWA/FTA AND MNDOT GUIDANCE FOR FORMAL STIP AMENDMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STIP MODIFICATIONS Effective: April 15, 2015 The STIP may be updated periodically throughout the course of the year for project

More information

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2018-2021 December, 2017 The preparation of this report was partially financed by FHWA/FTA Planning funds through the North Dakota Department of Transportation

More information

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2018-2021 December, 2017 The preparation of this report was partially financed by FHWA/FTA Planning funds through the North Dakota Department of Transportation

More information

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements CHAPTER 8 PROJECT INITIATION AND AUTHORIZATION SUMMARY Ensuring that a project is funded appropriately and included in all required

More information

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA Catherine McCreight, MBA Senior Transportation Planner Texas Department of Transportation - Houston District Houston-Galveston Area Council Bringing

More information

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT 600 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST JORDAN, MN 55352-9339 (952) 496-8346 Fax: (952) 496-8365 www.co.scott.mn.us MITCHELL J. RASMUSSEN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER

More information

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (269) 343-0766 www.katsmpo.org Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study @KATSMPO Purpose of Training 1. Discuss the Purpose, Products, and Structure of a Metropolitan

More information

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS 2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Background... 3 A. Policy Framework... 3 B. Development of the 2019-2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)..

More information

Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual

Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual February 2017 Division of Planning Office of Systems Planning and Program Management Contents Section Page Preface... iii HSIP Program Procedure...

More information

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY MOVE LV Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY Services PLANNING DATA + ANALYSIS EDUCATION PROJECTS + LAWS FUNDING Federal Government State Government Regional

More information

Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014

Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014 1 Guidance for Locally Administered Projects Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange August 27, 2013 Revised September 15, 2014 This document establishes guidelines for administering the program

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CATEGORY: DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING/ZONING TITLE: TRANSPORTATION PROPORTIONATE SHARE CALCULATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS CODE NUMBER: AC-13-16 ADOPTED:

More information

Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator

Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator What is CYMPO? Why do we have an MPO? Federal law requires Urbanized Areas over 50,000 people to have an MPO in order to receive federal funds 2003 the Governor of Arizona

More information

MiTIP, the Metropolitan Indianapolis Transportation Program : Beyond the Spreadsheets in the 21 st Century

MiTIP, the Metropolitan Indianapolis Transportation Program : Beyond the Spreadsheets in the 21 st Century MiTIP, the Metropolitan Indianapolis Transportation Program : Beyond the Spreadsheets in the 21 st Century October 26, 2016 Kristyn Campbell Senior Transportation Finance Analyst Indianapolis MPO kristyn.campbell@indympo.org

More information

E IMPROVE CONGESTION? IMPROVE CONGESTION? WHERE ARE WE GOING TO

E IMPROVE CONGESTION? IMPROVE CONGESTION? WHERE ARE WE GOING TO HERE ARE WE GOING TO PUT OVER A MILLION MORE PEOPLE? HOW CAN WE IMPROV UR EXISTING TRANSIT SYSTEM? WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR THIS? WHAT ABOUT EGIONAL APPROACH? WHO IS MAKING THESE DECISIONS? WHERE WILL FUNDIN

More information

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Title VI: Public Participation Plan Whatcom Council of Governments Public Participation Plan Adopted October 14, 2009 Updated November 12, 2014 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 East Champion Street Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 676 6974 Whatcom

More information

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County The transportation system serves Cambria County communities because people make decisions and take action toward the stated goals of the long-range transportation plan. Locally, these people include officials

More information

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by Development Services Transportation Division Adopted: Revisions Approved by: In cooperation with City Of Missoula County

More information

Contents. FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study

Contents. FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study KATS 5220 Lovers Lane, Suite 110 Portage, MI 49002 PHONE: (269) 343-0766 EMAIL: info@katsmpo.org WEB: www.katsmpo.org FY 2014 YEAR END REPORT FOR THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY December 2014 Contents

More information

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7.

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7. Project Information Application ID 215-D8-1 Date Submitted 6/29/215 Date Revised Project Name Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A County, Route, Section HAM-4/561-2.66/7.1 ODOT District District 8 County Hamilton

More information

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories This page left blank intentionally. Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E E 3 Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Highway Programs

More information

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2015-2018 Calvert County Planning Commission St. Mary s County Department of County Services Plaza

More information

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1 Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1 State Fiscal Year 2017 July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017 I. Work Program Purpose Each year the Arizona Department of Transportation Multimodal

More information

Ohio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs

Ohio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs Ohio Department of Transportation Transportation Funding for LPAs Christopher L. Brown, P.E., District Three LPA Errol R. Scholtz, E.I., District Three LPA John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director

More information

Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program

Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Decisionmaking Information Tools For Tribal Governments Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 4 What is the TTIP?

More information

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: February 14, 2018 MPO Executive Board: February 21, 2018

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: February 14, 2018 MPO Executive Board: February 21, 2018 MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: February 14, 2018 MPO Executive Board: February 21, 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Make a Recommendation on the Urban Grant, Regional and Urban Program Candidate

More information

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS 9. REVENUE SOURCES This Chapter summarizes multimodal revenue sources and estimates that are applicable to the City of Coolidge and the Town of Florence, together with financial constraints and opportunities

More information

Amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) August 2017

Amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) August 2017 Amendments to FY 2015-2018 Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) August 2017 The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is the MPO s short-range

More information

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH Mark A. Doctor, PE Professional Profile A career of over 27 years with the Federal Highway Administration in various transportation engineering positions with diverse experiences and accomplishments in

More information

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017 2018-2027 STIP Van Argabright November 9, 2017 2018-2027 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Adopted by BOT in August 2017 2 nd STIP produced under the Strategic Transportation Investments

More information

Staff Recommendation:

Staff Recommendation: ITEM 14 Action March 29, 2017 Approval to Amend the FY 2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Staff Recommendation: Issues: Background:

More information

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources Appendix I. Funding Sources FUNDING SOURCES planning and related efforts can be funded through a variety of local, state, and federal sources. However, these revenues have many guidelines in terms of how

More information

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

SMALL CITY PROGRAM.  ocuments/forms/allitems. SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently

More information

FFY Transportation Improvement Program MPO. Lawrence - Douglas County. Metropolitan Planning Organization

FFY Transportation Improvement Program MPO. Lawrence - Douglas County. Metropolitan Planning Organization 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program Lawrence - Douglas County MPO J x C $ Metropolitan Planning Organization Adopted: October 5, 2016 Amended: February 23, 2017 Amended: August 17, 2017 Administrative

More information

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion. 2014 TRAC Funding Application TRAC is responsible for committing development and construction funding towards projects that meet the criteria the of Major New Capacity Program. TRAC Policy defines Major

More information

STIP/ATIP TEMPLATE GUIDANCE PART I

STIP/ATIP TEMPLATE GUIDANCE PART I 2015-2018 STIP/ATIP TEMPLATE GUIDANCE PART I ATIP data should be transmitted via a customized Excel template provided by the Office of Transportation System Management (OTSM) in the following format. Please

More information

Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Programs

Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Programs Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Programs METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Under Title 23 of the United States Code pertaining to transportation, communities with population greater

More information

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) For Public Works Officers Institute & Expo March 22, 2017 Richard Ke, P.E. HSIP Manager Division of Local Assistance California Department of

More information

3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT

3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT Winchester-Frederick County MPO Policy Board Meeting Agenda Frederick County Administrative Offices - First Floor Conference Room 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, VA September 19, 2018-10:00 a.m. 1. ADMINISTRATIVE

More information

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP? HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP? The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, known as the STIP, is a list that shows prioritization, funding, and scheduling of transportation projects and programs

More information

FY 2016 Budget Questions District Department of Transportation

FY 2016 Budget Questions District Department of Transportation FY 2016 Budget Questions District Department of Transportation OPERATING BUDGET 1. Please explain the proposed 120% increase in FY 2016 Federal Grant Funds and for which projects these grants would be

More information

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS OKI 2015 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS CONCERNING AMENDMENT #1 OF THE FISCAL YEARS 2016 2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS,

More information

Mississippi Gulf Coast Metropolitan Planning Organization. Transportation Improvement Program FY

Mississippi Gulf Coast Metropolitan Planning Organization. Transportation Improvement Program FY Mississippi Gulf Coast Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program FY 2015-2019 November 2015 The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is a federally mandated planning body

More information

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for 2012-2015 Part II: TIP Development and Project Selection Processes MPO Planning Process The NIRPC Board of Commissioners

More information

HB2 Update October, 2014

HB2 Update October, 2014 HB2 Update October, 2014 The revised draft of the FY15-20 SYIP was released for public comment in September and the public comment period is open through October 30th. This revision reflects revised revenue

More information

FY Transportation Improvement Program

FY Transportation Improvement Program (CHATS) Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010-2015 June 8, 2009 1 Amendment Adopted: _September 24, 2009_ Amendment Adopted: _February 5, 2010 Amendment Adopted: May 17, 2010 Amendment Adopted: June

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) partners with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

More information

Amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) August 2016

Amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) August 2016 Amendments to FY 2015-2018 Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) August 2016 The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is the MPO s short-range

More information

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding

More information

South Dakota Department of Transportation. State Planning & Research Program for Local Governments

South Dakota Department of Transportation. State Planning & Research Program for Local Governments South Dakota Department of Transportation State Planning & Research Program for Local Governments The passage of Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act or "FAST Act", continues the requirement that

More information

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING Approved: Policy No.: 18-003(P) Effective: April 19, 2002 Responsible Division: Finance and Forecasting Gordon Proctor Director POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING I. POLICY STATEMENT: Accrued

More information

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S T A T E W I D E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M S T I P 2 015201 8 YOAKUM DISTRICT 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 T I P T R A N S I T I n i t i a l

More information

TRANSPORTATION DECISIONMAKING. Information Tools for Tribal Governments. Financial Planning

TRANSPORTATION DECISIONMAKING. Information Tools for Tribal Governments. Financial Planning TRANSPORTATION DECISIONMAKING Information Tools for Tribal Governments Financial Planning i TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. WHAT IS FINANCIAL PLANNING, AND HOW DOES IT WORK? 10 When

More information

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Module 2 Planning and Programming Module 2 Planning and Programming Contents: Section 1 Overview... 2-2 Section 2 Coordination with MPO... 2-4 Section 3 Functional Classification... 2-6 Section 4 Minute Order for Designation as Access

More information

Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018

Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018 Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018 Adopted: June 29, 2017 Prepared by the Greater Dalton Metropolitan Planning Organization In cooperation with the Georgia Department of Transportation Federal Highway

More information

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Program Announcement, Call for Projects, and NDOT Guidance for Potential Applications for 2019-2020 Funding www.nevadadot.com/tap

More information

RESOLUTION. No. O!5-2.C( Resolution approving the Fiscal Year Transportation Improvement Program.

RESOLUTION. No. O!5-2.C( Resolution approving the Fiscal Year Transportation Improvement Program. RESOLUTION No. O!5-2.C( Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2006-2008 Transportation Improvement Program. WHEREAS, the Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization was established to manage and

More information

Amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) October 2017

Amendments to FY Transportation Improvement Program of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) October 2017 Amendments to FY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement of the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) October 2017 The Transportation Improvement (TIP) is the MPO s short-range programming

More information

Lake Norman Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA March 8, 2017

Lake Norman Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA March 8, 2017 Lake Norman Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA March 8, 2017 I Call to Order Review of the Agenda Adoption of the February 8, 2017 Meeting Summary. II Roadway Projects Update Bill Thunberg (30 minutes)

More information

The Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization adopted the amendment to the Program on April 16, 2014.

The Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization adopted the amendment to the Program on April 16, 2014. 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, NC 28202 704-336-2205 www.crtpo.org April 17, 2014 Secretary Tony Tata North Carolina Department of Transportation Attention: Mike Bruff, PE 1554 Mail Service Center Raleigh,

More information

Re: Public Comment Period DRAFT Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program Amendment

Re: Public Comment Period DRAFT Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Public Works Department Working Together for a Better Tomorrow, Today April 12, 2017 Re: Public Comment Period DRAFT Fiscal Years 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program Amendment The Grand Island

More information

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consultant Service to Conduct a Visioning Study and Prepare Recommendations for the Culver City Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District September 2016 RFP Released: September

More information

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS Introduction The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and North Carolina General Assembly

More information

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20002-4290 (202) 962-3310 Fax: (202) 962-3202 Item #5 MEMORANDUM January 8, 2010 To: From:

More information

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area FFY 2015-2016 Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area A Grant Program of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) U.S. Department of Transportation

More information

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT Background As the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for Greater Kansas City, MARC is responsible for facilitating the development of long-range transportation

More information

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTINUING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR THE MADISON, WISCONSIN METROPOLITAN AREA between STATE OF WISCONSIN, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the MADISON AREA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

More information

RFP for Bicycle/Pedestrian Scoping Study Page 1

RFP for Bicycle/Pedestrian Scoping Study Page 1 Town of Burke 212 School Street West Burke, VT 05871 (802) 467-3717 Request for Proposal Bicycle and Pedestrian Scoping Study Contact: Al Duey, Burke Planning Commission Date of Issue: June 9, 2014 Deadline:

More information

MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET

MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET SFY 2022-2023 Illustrative Projects 2018-2021 INDIANAPOLIS REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (IRTIP) MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization October 2017 This

More information

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds

More information

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process 2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process Available Funding: (In Millions) CMAQ STP Preservation TOTAL 2021 2022 2021 2022 2021 2022 Regional $14.27 (project cap)$7.13 Countywide $2.41 (project cap)$1.2

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2019-2022 August, 2018 FISCAL YEARS 2019-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE GRAND FORKS - EAST GRAND FORKS METROPOLITAN AREA PREPARED BY: THE GRAND FORKS

More information

Section 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight

Section 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight Section 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight Certification MoDOT certifies that the transportation planning process is being carried out in accordance with the following requirements in 23

More information

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects SMART SCALE is a statewide program that distributes funding based on a transparent and objective evaluation of projects that will determine how effectively they help the state achieve its transportation

More information

Section 6. The Transportation Plan

Section 6. The Transportation Plan Section 6. The Transportation Plan Like the areas it covers, the needs and opportunities identified in the 2035 Plan are diverse economic development projects, highways and bridges, transit facilities

More information

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES Revised and Approved May 25, 2017 Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study 806 CitiCenter 146 South High Street Akron, Ohio 44308 This document was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan

More information

Statewide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement

Statewide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Guidance Updated December, 0 wide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement The wide Performance Program (SPP) Pavement is

More information

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 2016 PRIORITY PROJECTS REPORT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION This document was produced in cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration

More information

Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Information Requested Example Please Insert Your Data in This Column

Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Information Requested Example Please Insert Your Data in This Column Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Recipient name Minnesota Department of Transportation New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (i.e., Highway Infrastructure, Transit Capital, Fixed

More information

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year 2008-09 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HISP) 23 USC Section 148 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program (BPSP) Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety

More information

SECTION 5310 APPLICATION GUIDELINES FOR 2018 PROJECTS:

SECTION 5310 APPLICATION GUIDELINES FOR 2018 PROJECTS: #237894-2 KJM/CTH/JBS/JMD 6-26-17 SECTION 5310 APPLICATION GUIDELINES FOR 2018 PROJECTS: VEHICLE CAPITAL PURCHASES MOBILITY MANAGEMENT OPERATING NON-VEHICLE CAPITAL Administered by the Southeastern Wisconsin

More information

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Community Development Department Planning & Zoning Division REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS COMBINED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/ SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN State Project No. ATPL-5169 (048) RELEASE DATE: SEPTEMBER 23,

More information

LPA Programs How They Work

LPA Programs How They Work LPA Programs How They Work Ann Wills, P.E. Transportation Engineering Conference 2018 www.dotd.la.gov Requirements For ALL LPA Projects 1. Risk Assessment 2. Entity-State Agreement 3. Responsible Charge

More information

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation Table of Contents: Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation Executive Summary I. Introduction: the Potential for Transportation Energy

More information

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan STUDY: FINAL REPORT APPENDIX 5 Funding Plan May 2015 V:\2073\active\2073009060\report\DRAFT Final Report\rpt_MalPCH_DRAFTFinalReport-20150515.docx Pacific Coast Highway Safety Study: Funding Plan City

More information