Rural Consultation Process
|
|
- Benjamin Baldwin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Rural Consultation Process The Ohio Department of Transportation Rural Consultation Process
2 CONTENTS Definitions of Terms Introduction Federal Requirements for Rural Consultation Rural Consultation Processes 3.1 Background Planning Partners Mechanisms for Coordination Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPO) Annual District Government or Legislative Days District Staff Attendance at Local Government Meetings Ohio s Transportation Review Advisory Council (TRAC) Process Consultation with Transit Stakeholders Informal Processes Collaborative Products and Processes 4.1 ODOT s Project Development Process (PDP) Statewide Transportation Plan - Access Ohio 2040 (AO40) Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Direct Funding and Decision Making By Rural Local Officials Addtional Funding Opportunities Conclusion Resources
3 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS Definitions taken directly from 23 CFR , , and 49 U.S.C 5310 Consultation means one or more parties confer with other identified parties in accordance with an established process and, prior to taking action(s), considers the views of the other parties and periodically informs them about the action(s) taken. Cooperation means that parties involved in carrying out the transportation planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal or objective Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan means a locally developed, coordinated transportation plan that identifies the transportation needs of individuals with disabilities, older adults, and people with low incomes, provides strategies for meeting those local needs, and prioritizes transportation services for funding and implementation. The Federal Transit Authority (FTA) 5310 program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services. Long-Range Statewide Transportation Plan means the official, statewide, multimodal, transportation plan covering a period of no less than twenty years developed through the statewide transportation planning process. 2
4 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined by agreement between the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the area and the Governor, in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is carried out. Non-Metropolitan Area means a geographic area outside a designated metropolitan plannning area. Also referred to as rural area Non-Metropolitan Local Officials means elected and appointed officials of general purpose local government in non-metropolitan areas with responsibility for transportation. Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) means a statewide prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four years that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan, metropolitan transportation plans, and TIPs; required for projects to be eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) means a prioritized listing/ program of transportation projects covering a period of four years that is developed and formally adopted by an MPO as part of the metropolitan transportation planning process, consistent with the metropolitan transportation plan, and required for projects to be eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. 3
5 Rural Consultation Process 1. INTRODUCTION An open exchange of information between transportation users and government officials leads to enhanced decision-making. The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) understands this, and prioritizes collaboration with local officials throughout its transportation planning and project selection processes. ODOT s rural consultation process outlines the state s long standing and emerging efforts to cooperate with local officials in non-metropolitan areas of the state. Utilizing the processes outlined in this document, ODOT works closely with local stakeholders in the development of the Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) to make informed transportation infrastructure improvement decisions in rural areas. This process documentation is an update of ODOT s initial rural consultation process, which was published in December 2003, as required by federal regulation. 4
6 2. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RURAL CONSULTATION As specified in the United States Department of Transportation 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Section (b), The State shall provide for non-metropolitan local official participation in the development of the long-range statewide transportation plan and the STIP. The State shall have a documented process for cooperating with non-metropolitan local officials representing units of general purpose local government and/or local officials with responsibility for transportation that is separate and discrete from the public involvement process and provides an opportunity for their participation in the development of the long-range statewide transportation plan and the STIP. Further, States must review and solicit comments from non-metropolitan local officials and other interested parties for a period of not less than 60 days regarding the effectiveness of the consultation process and proposed modifications within two years of process implementation, and thereafter at least once every five years. A specific request for comments shall be directed to the state association of counties, state municipal league, regional planning agencies, or directly to non-metropolitan local officials. Each State, at its discretion, shall be responsible for determining whether to adopt proposed modifications. If a proposed modification is not adopted, the state shall make publicly available its reasons for not accepting the proposed modification, including notification to non-metropolitan local officials or their associations. MAP-21, which is the current federal transportation funding authorization legislation, provides guidance for cooperating with non-metropolitan officials in H.R Section 1202 (m), 5
7 ODOT District Map which states To carry out the transportation planning process required by this section, a State may establish and designate regional transportation planning organizations to enhance the planning, coordination, and implementation of statewide strategic long-range transportation plans and transportation improvement programs, with an emphasis on addressing the needs of nonmetropolitan areas of the State. To improve upon existing methods of collaboration, ODOT has created a regional transportation planning organization (RTPO) pilot program and is cooperating with 5 agencies in the development of the statewide transportation plan, STIP, and regional rural transportation plans. 3. RURAL CONSULTATION PROCESSES 3.1 Background ODOT is comprised of 12 district offices and a central office. The central office is responsible for developing ODOT policies and programs, managing local government funding programs, and carrying out transportation system analyses. District offices are responsible for maintaining pavement and bridge conditions on select roadways and are involved with the development of local governments projects. Much of the collaboration that occurs with stakeholders transpires at the ODOT district level. Coordination between ODOT staff, local officials, and other stakeholders is critical. ODOT staff have the expertise to assist local governments in solving their transportation challenges and to provide/find funding opportunities. Similarly, input from local officials helps ODOT make informed project selection decisions. The following outlines longstanding, as well as, emerging mechanisms for cooperating with local officials in non-metropolitan areas of Ohio. 6
8 3.2 Planning Partners 3.3 Mechanisms for Coordination ODOT district and central office staff cooperate with stakeholders in rural Ohio both formally and informally. ODOT s primary rural Ohio stakeholders include: Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) Economic Development Districts (EDDs) County Engineers County Commissioners Public Transit Agencies City Councils Mayors Township Trustees All of the above mentioned partners advocate on behalf of the residents and businesses within their regions and communicate community concerns to ODOT. While specific activities vary by district and project, cooperation between ODOT and non-metropolitan local officials occurs throughout the state. The following activities provide opportunity for collaboration between ODOT and local elected officials Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) On July 1, 2013, ODOT entered into formal agreement with five multicounty planning organizations (or councils of government) providing them with funding to conduct regional transportation planning in coordination with local stakeholders, Ohio MPOs, and ODOT. Much of Ohio s non-metropolitan local official coordination occurs between ODOT and these organizations. These five agencies are called Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) and cover 34 non-metropolitan counties in Ohio. 7
9 Ohio RTPOs Buckeye Hills Hocking Valley Regional Development District (Buckeye Hills) Logan Union Champaign Regional Planning Commission (LUC) Maumee Valley Planning Organization (MVPO) Ohio Mid-Eastern Governments Association (OMEGA) Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission (OVRDC) RTPOs are readily equipped to cooperate with ODOT in the development of the statewide planning process as their committee structures are comprised primarily of locally elected officials. In September 2014, ODOT will initiate development of the SFY STIP. The RTPOs will coordinate public involvement and local elected officials review of the STIP projects within each RTPO area and coordinate feedback with ODOT. Additionally, RTPOs regularly meet with ODOT district and central office staff to discuss transportation issues in their region and provide feedback on ODOT projects and planning processes. Ohio RTPOs also meet to discuss the best practices for rural transportation planning. 8
10 3.3.2 Annual District Government or Legislative Days Most ODOT Districts hold annual Government or Legislature Days. These daylong events include displays of projects and administrative processes, hand-outs, speakers on locally hot issues, and roundtable discussion sessions. Detailed lists of projects by county with the names of district contacts may also be provided. This provides an opportunity for rural local officials to understand the projects that are occurring in their region, and provide feedback to ODOT District Staff Attendance at Local Government Meetings District staff are active participants in the communities. They participate in meetings that include but are not limited to City Council meetings, Regional Planning Commission meetings, Economic Development meetings, County Commissioner meetings, and other meetings of regional significance. ODOT Districts use these meetings as a prelude to consultation with rural local governments on transportation issues and projects. ODOT attends additional governmental meetings as warranted or at the request of local officials Ohio s Transportation Review Advisory Council (TRAC) Process The Transportation Review Advisory Council (TRAC) was established by the Ohio General Assembly in 1997 under Ohio Revised Code Section TRAC is a permanent body established for overseeing the project selection process for major new transportation capacity projects. The TRAC is comprised of nine members, with the Director of the Ohio Department of Transportation acting as chair. Six members are appointed by the Governor and one each by the Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives and the President of the Ohio Senate. 9
11 TRAC s process includes selection of specific transportation projects, using clearly defined criterion to score and rank each project. Local governments may submit projects for ranking and selection. Inclusion of a submitted project in the local agency s long-range transportation plan is an important part of the ranking process. For more information on the TRAC, visit oh.us/trac/pages/default.aspx Consultation with Transit Stakeholders Transit service is an important topic for communities in rural Ohio. ODOT cooperates with rural local officials regarding transit in the following ways: Locally Developed Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plans FTA Section 5310 must be derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services plan (coordinated plan) and that plan shall be developed through a process that includes representatives of public, private, and non-profit transportation and human service providers, and participation by the general public. The collaboration that occurs throughout the development of coordinated plans provides ample opportunities for local officials to be part of the overall transportation planning and project selection process, as pertains to transit. Rural Intercity Bus Consultation Process ODOT cooperates with intercity bus operators using the process outlined below. Bus operator s comments assist ODOT in making decisions such as developing intercity bus routes. Per federal regulation 49 U.S.C. 5310, projects selected for funding under 10
12 1. Identify intercity bus providers in the State. 2. Send letter to Ohio intercity bus carriers with explanation of the consultation process. 3. Schedule individual consultation meetings to discuss current and proposed ODOT transit routes. 4. Incorporate comments into ODOT plans and policies. 5. Document the cooperation processes Informal Consultation Processes ODOT districts often communicate informally with rural local officials. Often times informal coordination arises from project specific questions or discussions. Over the years, partnerships have been developed between ODOT and rural officials that have led to open communication. 4. COLLABORATIVE PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES 4.1 ODOT s Project Development Process (PDP) ODOT s formal Project Development Process (PDP) is used for every project. The required planning level public involvement in the PDP includes local officials as stakeholders in the process. Consequently, rural local officials are informed of every ODOT project. The stakeholder involvement continues through the construction phase of ODOT s PDP. Activities include formal public meetings, open houses, informational notifications, and coordinating project legislation agreements with affected local jurisdictions. 11
13 4.2 Statewide Transportation Plan - Access Ohio 2040 (AO40) Ohio s long-range transportation plan, Access Ohio, was first published in the 1990s and has been subsequently updated twice. The most recent plan update has a horizon year of 2040 and includes a comprehensive inventory, forecast, and analysis of the trends and issues affecting transportation throughout Ohio. In developing Access Ohio 2040, ODOT formed a steering committee comprised of modally diverse stakeholders throughout the state. Many of these stakeholders were local officials. ODOT hosted several meetings with Access Ohio steering committee members, including a series of regional meetings where ODOT travelled to different portions of the state to get feedback as the plan progressed. ODOT also solicited feedback on the state s transportation system via a customer preference survey. 4.3 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The STIP is a document that lists Ohio s plan for utilizing federal transportation dollars over a four year period. To receive federal funding, a project must be listed on the STIP. Early in the STIP development process, ODOT district staff meet with rural local officials on an individual basis and in groups to discuss potential projects for inclusion in the STIP. In turn, local officials keep ODOT apprised of the progress of their locally initiated projects in order to coordinate project delivery, maintenance of traffic, and other related issues. The local officials have access to the complete STIP via ODOT s STIP website, including any amendments. As part of the STIP process, ODOT allocates funding for the Local Bridge Program (LBR), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and the County Surface Transportation Program (CSTP). These programs 12
14 are administered by the County Engineer Association of Ohio (CEAO). The counties submit projects to the oversight committee for review and project selection. 4.4 Direct Funding and Decision Making by Rural Local Officials The State of Ohio provides rural officials direct decision making authority for selecting and advancing local transportation projects. A portion of the state motor fuel tax goes directly to municipalities, counties, and townships for highways under their jurisdiction. Local governments vary in their use of these funds for planning, construction, maintenance, and operations. The project selection for these funds is made by the individual local government. Ohio counties and municipalities also have the right to levy vehicle local permissive license taxes to increase the amount of funding available for local transportation projects. 4.5 Additional Funding Opportunities Several ODOT programs provide funding which rural areas are eligible: The Highway Safety Improvement Program provides federal funds for improving the safety of the existing state highway system. State and locally sponsored projects compete together for funding. The Transportation Alternatives Program provides federal funds to local governments for projects which focus on non-motorized modes of transportation, community improving activities, environmental mitigation activities, and construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas. The Small Cities Program provides federal funds to cities with populations of 5,000 to 25,000 that are not located within a MPO area. This program may be used for any road, safety, or signal project on the Federal-Aid system. 13
15 The Municipal Bridge Program provides federal funds to municipal corporations and Regional Transit Authorities for bridge replacement or bridge rehabilitation projects. The Safe Routes to School Program provides funds to encourage and enable children in grades K-8 to bicycle or walk to school safely. Funds can be used for both infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects and may be up to 100% federally funded. The Appalachia Local Access Road (LAR) Program provides $1 million annually for roads which improve access to industrial parks, businesses, educational centers, and recreational areas in Ohio s 32 Appalachian counties. The Township Sign Safety Program provides $1 million annually in ODOT Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds to upgrade safety signage on Ohio s township roadways. ODOT provides funds to the County Engineers Association of Ohio (CEAO) for county funded programs. The CEAO serves as program manager and is responsible for project selection, funding criteria, and program priorities. The Urban Paving Program funds eligible surface treatment and resurfacing projects on state and U.S. routes within municipal corporations. Ohio s Bridge Partnership Program is designed to help reduce the excess of deficient county bridges. ODOT works cooperatively with County and City Engineers to replace bridges in need of repair and/or replacement. The Transportation Improvement Districts (TIDs) Program promotes intergovernment and public-private cooperation by coordinating resources in transporation and funding for: preliminary engineering, detailed design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. 14
16 5. CONCLUSION ODOT is committed to early and ongoing collaboration with all partners and stakeholders, welcoming feedback using the processes discussed above, as well as through informal communication streams. Working together with officials in rural Ohio, agencies throughout the state will collaborate to maintain a vibrant transportation network. Through all these efforts ODOT remains committed to working as partners with FTA, FHWA, Ohio s MPOs, rural local governments and other regional and state government organizations to provide the citizens and businesses of Ohio with a safe, efficient, and accessible transportation system. 6. RESOURCES ODOT s Rural Consultation website: Pages/RuralLocalConsultation.aspx Office of Statewide Planning and Research website: default.aspx Access Ohio website: StatewidePlanning/access.ohio/Pages/default.aspx STIP Website: default.aspx 15
ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process
ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process The Ohio Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction to ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process 3 1.1 Public Involvement
More informationOhio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs
Ohio Department of Transportation Transportation Funding for LPAs Christopher L. Brown, P.E., District Three LPA Errol R. Scholtz, E.I., District Three LPA John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director
More informationTitle VI: Public Participation Plan
Whatcom Council of Governments Public Participation Plan Adopted October 14, 2009 Updated November 12, 2014 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 East Champion Street Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 676 6974 Whatcom
More informationFUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources
Appendix I. Funding Sources FUNDING SOURCES planning and related efforts can be funded through a variety of local, state, and federal sources. However, these revenues have many guidelines in terms of how
More informationHighway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual
Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual February 2017 Division of Planning Office of Systems Planning and Program Management Contents Section Page Preface... iii HSIP Program Procedure...
More informationPurpose. Funding. Eligible Projects
SMART SCALE is a statewide program that distributes funding based on a transparent and objective evaluation of projects that will determine how effectively they help the state achieve its transportation
More informationPUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 2017 Educational Series PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Federal and state law both require the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to support and promote public transportation
More informationTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016
Regional Transportation Commission TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Contents 1.0 Purpose and Eligibility... 2 2.0 Process... 5 3.0 Implementation of Funded Projects... 5 Attachment
More informationNorthern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1
Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1 State Fiscal Year 2017 July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017 I. Work Program Purpose Each year the Arizona Department of Transportation Multimodal
More informationModule 2 Planning and Programming
Module 2 Planning and Programming Contents: Section 1 Overview... 2-2 Section 2 Coordination with MPO... 2-4 Section 3 Functional Classification... 2-6 Section 4 Minute Order for Designation as Access
More informationDirector of Transportation Planning
Director of Transportation Planning The Lehigh Valley Planning Commission (LVPC) is seeking a candidate for Director of Transportation Planning to lead a team developing and managing the implementation
More informationWHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTINUING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR THE MADISON, WISCONSIN METROPOLITAN AREA between STATE OF WISCONSIN, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the MADISON AREA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
More informationSMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.
SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently
More informationTransportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for
Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for 2012-2015 Part II: TIP Development and Project Selection Processes MPO Planning Process The NIRPC Board of Commissioners
More informationKYOVA Interstate Planning Commission
KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Sub-allocated Funding Process and Application Package This packet includes information and guidance about the process used by KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission to
More informationWELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY
WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (269) 343-0766 www.katsmpo.org Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study @KATSMPO Purpose of Training 1. Discuss the Purpose, Products, and Structure of a Metropolitan
More informationPoughkeepsie Dutchess County Transportation Council Bylaws
Poughkeepsie Dutchess County Transportation Council Bylaws Effective January 1, 2015 (as amended March 24, 2016) 27 High Street, 2nd Floor Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone: 845.486.3600 Fax: 845.486.3610 Email:
More informationFFY Transportation Improvement Program
Lawton Metropolitan Planning Organization DRAFT FFY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program Approved, 2017 The Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area
FFY 2015-2016 Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area A Grant Program of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) U.S. Department of Transportation
More informationAppendix E Federal and State Funding Categories
Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories This page left blank intentionally. Federal and State Funding Categories Appendix E E 3 Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories Highway Programs
More informationTransportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon
Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon Every profession has its own acronyms and jargon. The shorthand wording makes it easier and quicker for professionals in any given field to communicate
More informationSENATE, No. 876 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator STEPHEN M. SWEENEY District (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem) Senator STEVEN V. OROHO District
More informationCALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2015-2018 Calvert County Planning Commission St. Mary s County Department of County Services Plaza
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/ 1 Transportation Alternatives Program Authorized
More informationAppendix E: Grant Funding Sources
Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding
More informationJune Planning & Programming Transportation Projects for the NOACA Region
June 2016 Planning & Programming Transportation Projects for the NOACA Region 1) Title & Subtitle Regional Transportation Investment Policy (revised June 2016) 3) Author(s) Programming staff and other
More informationMissoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by
Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by Development Services Transportation Division Adopted: Revisions Approved by: In cooperation with City Of Missoula County
More informationt J{li Northwestern Indiana
Lake, Porter, and La Porte Counties, Indiana for State Fiscal Years 2018-2021 May 18, 2017 List Version DF6 t J{li Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission 6100 Southport Road (219) 763-6060 Portage,
More informationTransportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department
Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department 2 Transportation Improvement Program 2018 2022 Mid-America Regional Council 3 4 Transportation Improvement
More informationMAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements
Date: July 13, 2012 Subject: MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements The recently enacted Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) includes a number of substantial changes
More information2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects
This document is available in accessible formats when requested five days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization and is prepared in cooperation
More informationTable to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation
Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation Key Characteristics of the Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom Programs Formal name Elderly Individuals
More informationWHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the DUBUQUE Metropolitan Planning Area; and
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTINUING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR THE DUBUQUE URABNIZED AREA, WISCONSIN METROPOLITAN AREA between STATE OF WISCONSIN, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the DUBUQUE METROPOLITAN
More informationMoving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) ATP 6 Discussion June 28, 2013 Minnesota Overview: MAP-21 vs. SAFETEA-LU Overall apportionment consistent
More informationMAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions
MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions This paper provides an overview of the project delivery provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). It also briefly summarizes
More informationProgram Management Plan FTA Section 5310
Program Management Plan FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities In conformance with the requirements of FTA Circular 9070.1G A. MAP-21 Introduction... 3 B. Statutory
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan
October 23rd, 2015 Attention: Qualified and Interested Consultants REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan The Posey County Economic Development Partnership, cooperatively
More informationCass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018
Cass County Rural Task Force 2020-2023 Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018 The Southwest Michigan Planning Commission (SWMPC) is pleased to announce the Call for Projects for the Cass County
More informationFUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES
FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES Revised and Approved May 25, 2017 Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study 806 CitiCenter 146 South High Street Akron, Ohio 44308 This document was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan
More informationTEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S T A T E W I D E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M S T I P 2 015201 8 YOAKUM DISTRICT 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 T I P T R A N S I T I n i t i a l
More informationMOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY
MOVE LV Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY Services PLANNING DATA + ANALYSIS EDUCATION PROJECTS + LAWS FUNDING Federal Government State Government Regional
More informationFormal STIP Amendment
FHWA/FTA AND MNDOT GUIDANCE FOR FORMAL STIP AMENDMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STIP MODIFICATIONS Effective: April 15, 2015 The STIP may be updated periodically throughout the course of the year for project
More informationMinnesota Department of Transportation Office of Transit. State Management Plan
Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Transit State Management Plan Section 5310 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES April 4, 2016 Table of Contents A. Program Goals
More informationOVERALL WORK PROGRAM. Process and Procedures
OVERALL WORK PROGRAM Process and Procedures As Recommended for Approval by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 11, 2015 Approved by the OahuMPO Policy Board on September XX, 2015 Prepared by
More informationQuestions & Answers. Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009
Questions & Answers Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009 All Programs: 1. June 2007 Q. Do applicants have to list
More informationThe Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects
The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transit Routes... 2 Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act)... 3 Transit Operators and Recipients of
More informationAppendix 5 Freight Funding Programs
5. Chapter Heading Appendix 5 Freight Programs Table of Contents 4.1 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG);... 5-1 4.2 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Discretionary Grant Program
More informationTexas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 71 Public Transportation. (a) Applicability. The United States Congress revised 49
Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 0 SUBCHAPTER C. FEDERAL PROGRAMS.. Section 0 Grant Program. (a) Applicability. The United States Congress revised U.S.C. 0, with the passage of Moving Ahead
More informationPROJECT SELECTION Educational Series
PROJECT SELECTION 2017 Educational Series PROJECT SELECTION THE PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS Understanding how the state s roads, bridges and other transportation infrastructure are selected for funding helps
More informationOF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FHWA Virginia Division/FTA Region III Review Documentation in support of the FHWA/FTA PLANNING FINDING and approval of the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
More informationR E G I O N A L PLANNING CO MMISSION P O L I C I E S A N D P R O C E D U R E S MANUAL
R E G I O N A L PLANNING CO MMISSION P O L I C I E S A N D P R O C E D U R E S MANUAL Regional Planning Commission Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Tammany, and Tangipahoa Parishes 10
More informationUnderstanding the. Program
Understanding the Transportation Improvement Program Aka: TIP 101 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Federally Mandated for all MPO s by USDOT Short Range (no more than four years) All federally
More informationNavigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects
Navigating MAP 21 Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects Presenters Dave Tyahla NRPA Christopher Douwes Federal Highway Administration Margo Pedroso Safe Routes to School National
More informationRegional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B
Regional Transportation Plan: 2007-2030 Appendix B APPENDIX B POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources for transportation improvement projects are needed if the recommended projects of the Transportation
More informationSUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014
SUMMARY OF THE ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) submitted the Generating Renewal, Opportunity, and Work with Accelerated Mobility, Efficiency,
More information2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS
2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Background... 3 A. Policy Framework... 3 B. Development of the 2019-2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)..
More informationProject Selection Advisory Council
Project Selection Advisory Council March 13, 2014 Sheri Warrington, Manager of MPO Activities Office of Transportation Planning 1 Project Selection Criteria Best Practices Degree of implementation in other
More information2. Transportation Alternatives Program Activities Regulations and Guidelines... 4, 5 & Eligible and Ineligible Items...
FY 2018 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM INSTRUCTIONS, GUIDELINES AND APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) 1. Instructions for Submitting a Transportation Alternatives Program Application.. 1 2. Transportation
More informationGuidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014
1 Guidance for Locally Administered Projects Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange August 27, 2013 Revised September 15, 2014 This document establishes guidelines for administering the program
More informationAPPENDIX 5. Funding Plan
STUDY: FINAL REPORT APPENDIX 5 Funding Plan May 2015 V:\2073\active\2073009060\report\DRAFT Final Report\rpt_MalPCH_DRAFTFinalReport-20150515.docx Pacific Coast Highway Safety Study: Funding Plan City
More information2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects
2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects Regional Solicitation Workshop April 17 2018 Regional Solicitation Purpose To distribute federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP)
More informationFiscal Year 2018 Competitive Funding Opportunity; Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/25/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-13554, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal
More informationRegional Transportation Investment Policy
Regional Transportation Investment Policy Planning & Programming Transportation Projects for the NOACA Region October 2015 NORTHEAST T OHIO A R E A W I D E COORDINATING OR I NG A G E N C Y 1299 Superior
More informationFiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES
Fiscal Year 2014 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. Instructions for Submitting a Transportation Alternatives Program Application. 1 2. Transportation
More informationLPA Programs How They Work
LPA Programs How They Work Ann Wills, P.E. Transportation Engineering Conference 2018 www.dotd.la.gov Requirements For ALL LPA Projects 1. Risk Assessment 2. Entity-State Agreement 3. Responsible Charge
More informationMiTIP APPLICATION PACKET
SFY 2022-2023 Illustrative Projects 2018-2021 INDIANAPOLIS REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (IRTIP) MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization October 2017 This
More informationSection 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight
Section 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight Certification MoDOT certifies that the transportation planning process is being carried out in accordance with the following requirements in 23
More informationBOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Fiscal Year 2016 Unified Planning Work Program Approved by Policy Committee - April 13, 2015 Prepared by Bowling Green-Warren County Metropolitan
More informationNational Capital Region Transportation Planning Board
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20002-4290 (202) 962-3310 Fax: (202) 962-3202 Item #5 MEMORANDUM January 8, 2010 To: From:
More informationMegan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer. Federal Highway Administration Washington Division. March 14, 2017
Megan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer Federal Highway Administration Washington Division March 14, 2017 1 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/
More informationMID-HUDSON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS GRANT APPLICATION.
MID-HUDSON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS GRANT APPLICATION January 2009 O C T C Introduction The three transportation councils within the Mid-Hudson
More informationAppendix B. FAQ Brochure LOCHSTP Plan Outline Transportation Service Survey Project Prioritization Criteria
Appendix B Connecticut DOT: LOCHSTP Process Steps and Timeline FAQ Brochure LOCHSTP Plan Outline Transportation Service Survey Project Prioritization Criteria Coordinated Planning Process Interim Guidance
More informationSAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background
SAFETEA-LU This document provides information related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) that was previously posted on the Center for
More informationThe Public Participation Plan in Transportation Decision Making
The Public Participation Plan in Transportation Decision Making West Michigan Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program (WestPlan) Adopted: August 15, 2018 West Michigan Metropolitan Transportation
More informationSection Policies and purposes
Chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act Related FAST and MAP-21 provisions December 1, 2015 Sec. 5301 Policies and Purposes 3 Sec. 5302 Definitions.
More informationA Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region
A Guide to Transportation Decision Making In the Kansas City region 2 Guide to Transportation Decision Making Table of Contents Purpose of guide...4 MARC s planning role...5 What is transportation decision
More information9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs
9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs 9.1. Grant Funding Overview Grant funding continues to be a key factor for ports in meeting capital investment requirements. Grants can
More informationCITY OF TUCSON (GRANTEE) PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (PAG) (METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION)
CITY OF TUCSON (Grantee) PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (PAG) (METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION) Program Management Plan 49 U.S.C. 5316 Urban Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) 49 U.S.C. 5317 Urban New
More informationDate: June 27, Board of Directors. Neil McFarlane
Date: June 27, 2012 To: From: Board of Directors Neil McFarlane Subject: RESOLUTION 12-06-53 OF THE TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON (TRIMET) AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN GENERAL The City of Tyler currently serves as the fiscal agent for the Tyler Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), which represents the Tyler Metropolitan Study Area.
More informationTransportation Planning Prospectus
Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Planning Prospectus Effective October 1, 2017 Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 138 Second Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee
More informationDeveloping the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program
Transportation Decisionmaking Information Tools For Tribal Governments Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 4 What is the TTIP?
More informationAPPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Job Access Reverse Commute Grant Funding (JARC, Section 5307) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Grant Funding
More informationNotice. Quality Assurance Statement
Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of information
More informationNon-Motorized Transportation Funding Options
Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options Bicycle and pedestrian projects are broadly eligible for funding from nearly all major federal highway, transit, safety, and other programs. To be eligible
More informationDCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015
DCHC MPO ing Overview & Guidance draft January 2015 General Ratio APD Bond R CMAQ DP SHRP Appalachian Development Highway Revenue Bond Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Demonstration, Priority, and
More informationREPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM NO..d REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: July, SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NOS. -, -, -, - AND -0 OF LOCAL SUPPORT AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF APPLICATIONS FOR
More informationFFY Development. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) May 23, 2016 Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization
FFY 2017 2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Development May 23, 2016 Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) + The TIP is a five-year schedule of
More informationDEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AUDIT SUMMARY Our review included an examination of the accounts and activities of the Department of Rail and
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet FY 2019
Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet FY 2019 Table of Contents 1. Program Background... 4 a. Introduction... 4 b. Legislative History... 4 c. Performance Management... 5 2.
More informationAssociation of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act General Overview Total authorizations (Highway Trust Fund, HTF, Contract Authority plus General Funds
More informationHOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?
HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP? The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, known as the STIP, is a list that shows prioritization, funding, and scheduling of transportation projects and programs
More informationStates Approaches to Transportation Project Prioritization
States Approaches to Transportation Project Prioritization Linking Policy, Planning and Programming Prepared by: Metropolitan Planning Council 1 How should Illinois prioritize its transportation project
More informationPlanning Roles, Responsibilities, & Cooperative Operation Manual Indiana Department of Transportation
Planning Roles, Responsibilities, & Cooperative Operation Manual 2014 Indiana Department of Transportation October 1, 2014 Contents PLANNING RESPONSIBILITIES OVERVIEW... 4 MPO RESPONSIBILITIES... 4 MPO
More informationAMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21
AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21 SAFETEA LU PROGRAMS 2012 MAP-21 PROGRAMS ANALYSIS 3 Distinct programs with their own funding, and mechanics
More informationMemorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee
Memorandum Date: 02.05.09 RE: Plans and Programs Committee February 10, 2009 To: From: Through: Subject: Summary Plans and Programs Committee: Commissioners Chu (Chair), Campos (Vice Chair), Chiu, Elsbernd,
More informationTransportation Planning Policy Manual
Transportation Planning Policy Manual September 2001 Transportation Planning Policy Manual September 2001 Manual Notices Manual Notice 2001-1 To: From: Manual: Districts, Divisions and Offices Kirby W.
More informationADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CATEGORY: DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING/ZONING TITLE: TRANSPORTATION PROPORTIONATE SHARE CALCULATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS CODE NUMBER: AC-13-16 ADOPTED:
More informationNORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2018-2021 December, 2017 The preparation of this report was partially financed by FHWA/FTA Planning funds through the North Dakota Department of Transportation
More informationDRAFT JARC FUNDING APPLICATION January 29, 2013
DRAFT JARC FUNDING APPLICATION January 29, 2013 Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Program Introduction The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Act, a Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)
More information