NAAC REASONABLE STANDARD Student-Athlete Employment
|
|
- Bryan Conley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NAAC REASONABLE STANDARD Relevant Bylaws: 12.4 Employment Student-Athletes (Employment at Camp or Clinic) Purpose: To ensure that institutions are engaging in appropriate monitoring, education and documentation with regard to student-athlete employment. Generally, to ensure that the pay, benefits and duties of employed student-athletes are comparable to other employees of similar skills and experience. Monitoring Standards: Activity: Collect and review the following information from any student-athlete who is employed in any capacity (e.g. camp or clinic, federal work-study) other than fee-for-lesson employment (academic year or summer). The information collected should include: Name of Employer Employer address Employer /phone Name of Supervisor A description of how the student-athlete obtained the job Description of duties Expected start and end dates Pay rate Anticipated hours per week Payment format (check, cash, direct deposit etc) Other employment benefits (transportation, meals, etc) Frequency: Ideally, prior to the student-athlete beginning the employment, with updates as appropriate. Particular attention should be paid when dealing with elite student-athlete employment, athletic department employment, and employment arranged by the institution. There is a heightened responsibility to monitor when the employer is considered a Booster. Time Frame: Year round, as student-athletes begin employment or Compliance becomes aware of the employment..
2 Activity: Collect and review the following information from any student-athlete who is engaged in feefor-lesson employment (academic year or summer). The information collected should include: Name of individual(s) receiving lessons A description of how the student-athlete was retained The location at which the lessons will be provided Facility usage fees or phone number of individual(s) receiving lessons Expected start and end dates for lessons Person responsible for payment Pay rate Anticipated number of lessons per week Payment format (e.g. check, cash, etc.) Other employment benefits (e.g. transportation, meals, etc.) Frequency: Ideally, prior to the student-athlete beginning the fee-for-lesson employment, with updates as appropriate. Time Frame: Year round. Activity: Require student-athletes reporting employment to sign a statement entitling Compliance to review employment records (e.g. pay stubs), upon request. Additionally, require employers to sign a statement that they have read and understood the NCAA rules regarding student-athlete employment and that they will provide employment records (e.g. pay stubs), upon request. Frequency: Ideally, prior to the student-athlete beginning any employment, with updates as appropriate. Time Frame: Year round. Education Standards: Activity: Educate student-athletes and employers regarding NCAA rules regarding student-athlete employment. Frequency: At reasonable intervals as determined by the institution, but at least once annually, and any time a student-athlete reports new employment. Time frame: Year round. Activity: Educate parents, coaches and other appropriate athletics department staff or university personnel regarding NCAA rules regarding student-athlete employment. Frequency: At reasonable intervals as determined by the institution, but at least once annually. Time frame: Year round.
3 Documentation: Activity: Maintain a record of the information collected and reviewed regarding any student-athlete employment. Frequency: At least once per academic year, with updates as appropriate. Time Frame: Ideally, prior to participation in any competition. Retain documents for the duration of NCAA statute of limitations or in accordance with institutional policy, whichever is longer Activity: Maintain a record of the education provided to student-athletes, parents, institutional staff members, employers and others regarding student-athlete employment. Person(s) Responsible: Senior Compliance Administrator or designee (other than a sport specific staff member). Frequency: Each time education is provided. Time Frame: Retain documents for the duration of NCAA statute of limitations or in accordance with institutional policy, whichever is longer. Activity: Develop and maintain written procedures that delineate and assign responsibility for all aspects of student-athlete employment monitoring. Person Responsible: Senior Compliance Administrator or designee (other than a sport specific staff member). Frequency: Review documents annually. Time Frame: Retain the document, in its updated form, indefinitely.
4 NCAA Committee on Infractions Suggestions or Statements: (drawn from major infractions public reports) July 11, 2007 University of Oklahoma From the Committee on Infractions report: The committee concludes that the institution should have known that football student-athletes worked at the dealership during the academic year because (1) the dealership's unique status as the apparent largest employer of student-athletes necessitated a regular channel of direct communication between the institution and the dealership, rather than the institution relying exclusively on student-athletes to register their employment; and (2) student-athlete 2's disclosure on his 2005 student-athlete summer employment form should have alerted the institution that student-athletes worked at the dealership during the academic year without the institution's knowledge. This should have triggered the institution to ascertain the extent of the unmonitored employment and take corrective action to avoid such breakdowns in the future. The investigation revealed that the dealership held a unique status that could not be characterized as the typical student-athlete employer. Institution officials with responsibility for coordinating employment for student-athletes could not identify an employer who employed more football studentathletes during the time period set forth in the finding. As stated earlier in this report, the football office referred several student-athletes to the dealership for employment. Student-athlete 1 referred student-athlete 2 for employment at the dealership. From the summer of 2002 through the spring of 2006, the dealership employed at least 17 football student-athletes, including eight student-athletes in the summer of 2004 and 12 student-athletes in the summer of The director of football operations, who was responsible for coordinating employment for football student-athletes, stated that he maintained contact with the dealership's manager during the summers of 2004 and 2005, but that he had no communication regarding academic year employment after the conclusion of each of those summers. There was no indication that any communication regarding the academic year employment of student-athletes occurred between the institution and the dealership. Because the dealership employed so many football student-athletes, the committee concluded that the institution should have undertaken more extensive communication to monitor the student-athletes' employment. Moreover, during the hearing, it was revealed that the dealership sponsored and hosted a sports radio show, which originated from the dealership. From time-to-time university athletics officials, including the director of football operations, appeared at the dealership as guests on the radio broadcast. Despite the presence of university officials at the dealership, no effort was made to do any on-site spot checks or otherwise monitor the employment of student-athletes at the dealership. Further, the institution should have been alerted after it received information in August 2005 that student-athlete 2 worked at the dealership during the 2005 spring academic term that its monitoring process was insufficient. This realization, along with the dealership's status as the apparent leading employer of football student-athletes, should have raised awareness with the institution that more interaction was needed to effectively monitor the dealership's employment of student-athletes. However, the institution did not take any additional measures to either communicate with the
5 dealership concerning academic year employment or review with student-athlete 2 his academic year employment. Additionally, the committee noted that a university generated employment document labeled "Written Statement" specifies the following: The employer and student-athlete will make available for review and inspection, by an authorized representative at the NCAA, Big 12 Conference or the institution, copies of all documents, earning statements and other records related to the employment. Despite this provision, the university never took the opportunity to examine employment records from the dealership until after the investigation was initiated. There have been several other cases where the committee has found institutional failure to monitor the employment of student-athletes. Specifically: University of Arkansas (2003) - In finding a failure to monitor in the 2003 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (Arkansas) case, the committee recognized that, even though the institution did not have any knowledge that student-athletes currently worked at the employer, the institution still should have regularly sent the employer forms requesting identification of student-athlete employees, as well as informing the employer, of NCAA employment rules. This was necessary because this employer had regularly hired student-athletes in the past and was a "prominent and favored representative" who had "special access and interaction with student-athletes." The committee concluded that the dealership's position in the Oklahoma case as a significant employer of football student-athletes warranted additional communication and monitoring similar to that of the employer in the 2003 Arkansas case. Southeast Missouri State University (1999) - The committee found that the institution failed to monitor the employment of prospective and enrolled student-athletes at a local business. The institution, among other shortcomings, failed to monitor the circumstances of the student-athletes' employment, particularly the student-athletes' rate of pay. Texas A&M University, College Station (1994) - The committee found a lack of institutional control for failing to detect violations of NCAA employment bylaws that were perpetrated by one representative of the institution's athletics interests over a period of approximately 20 months. In that situation, similar to the current case, institutional staff members did not have actual knowledge of the violations that consisted of the intentional acts of one representative of the institution's athletics interests. In the Texas A&M case, the representative employed and overcompensated several football student-athletes. The institution had a monitoring system in place that consisted of informing potential employers of NCAA rules, obtaining information from
6 the employer describing the job and obtaining information from the student-athlete subsequent to employment. However, the committee noted as significant that "no monitoring of jobs took place to determine whether the employment of the studentathlete was in compliance with NCAA legislation during the actual employment. No information was gathered on the job locations." The committee concedes that institutions cannot reasonably contact all potential employers of studentathletes to determine whether student-athletes are employed. However, given the dealership's unique status, some level of communication between the institution and the dealership was necessary to ensure that violations did not occur. This is even more imperative given that student-athlete 2 reported on his 2005 student-athlete summer employment form that he worked during the spring of 2005 at the dealership. Georgetown University (2009) - The committee found a lack of institutional control for failing to have internal controls in place to monitor baseball student-athlete federal work-study employment. During the through academic years, the institution and the head coach failed to monitor federal work-study employment in the baseball program to ensure that student-athletes were compensated only for work actually performed. During the through academic years, 26 baseball student-athletes employed by the baseball team in the institution's work-study program received approximately $61,552 for work they did not perform. Revision History: Date Author Brief Summary of Revisions NAAC s Reasonable Standards are intended to establish an expectation to which all institutions will adhere when monitoring an institution s compliance with NCAA rules, providing education regarding NCAA rules and documenting compliance with NCAA rules. Every institution has different needs and must assess those needs. Such assessment may require institutions to implement monitoring, education, policies or procedures that exceed what is prescribed in this Reasonable Standard. The NCAA Enforcement Staff will give consideration to these standards in reviewing whether institutions have implemented adequate education, systems and monitoring.
Head Coach Responsibilities Regarding Compliance with and Violations of NCAA Rules
Head Coach Responsibilities Regarding Compliance with and Violations of NCAA Rules What is a head coach's responsibility for ensuring NCAA violations do not occur within his/her program? As of October
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT. OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS---This report is organized as follows:
FOR RELEASE Friday, Noon (Central time) CONTACT: David Swank, Chair NCAA Committee on Infractions University of Oklahoma UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS---This report
More informationCHEYNEY UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION AUGUST 21, 2014
CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION AUGUST 21, 2014 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division II Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised
More informationOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals
More informationPractice Exam. PRACTICE EXAM Academic Year: Division: Date: 01/19/2018 Test ID: Page 1
1 Outside of the contact period, a member of the football coaching staff may speak at a banquet at which prospective student-athletes are in attendance, provided. A) t is not a dead period and the coach
More informationREPORT OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DIVISION I INFRACTIONS APPEALS COMMITTEE. April 22, Report No. 372
REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DIVISION I INFRACTIONS APPEALS COMMITTEE Report No. 372 University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida This report is filed in accordance with NCAA
More informationNCAA IMPOSES PENALTIES IN TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS CASE
FOR RELEASE: CONTACT: Immediately S. David Berst Director of Enforcement NCAA IMPOSES PENALTIES IN TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS CASE Fort Worth, Texas--The NCAA Committee on Infractions announced
More informationUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION JUNE 27, 2014
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION JUNE 27, 2014 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals
More informationNCAA Division II Essential Rules Reference Guide
The NCAA Division II Essential Rules Reference Guide has been developed as a tool for athletics administrative staff members when dealing with essential and frequent compliance related issues. This reference
More informationTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION November 14, 2017
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions (COI) is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals from
More informationNCAA Division I Adopted Legislation -- Override Period Expires March 20
Proposal Number: RWG-13-3 Title: RECRUITING -- DEREGULATION OF MODES AND NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS ON COMMUNICATION Intent: To eliminate restrictions governing modes and numerical limitations on recruiting
More informationWinning with Integrity: Donor and Fan Guide
T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f T e x a s at A u s t i n Intercollegiate Athletics Winning with Integrity: Donor and Fan Guide We invite you, as donors and fans, to join our team and help us carry out our
More informationSDSU ATHLETICS COMPLIANCE Commitment to Compliance: Women s Rowing or Swimming & Diving Graduate Assistant Coach
STAFF MEMBER INFORMATION Name Email Address _2018-2019 SDSU Athletics Start Date Red ID Academic Year GRADUATE ASSISTANT: NCAA BYLAWS 11.01.4 Coach, Graduate Assistant Women s Rowing and Swimming and Diving.
More informationSummary of NCAA Regulations NCAA Division II
Academic Year 2011-12 Summary of NCAA Regulations NCAA Division II For: Purpose: Student-athletes. To summarize NCAA regulations regarding eligibility of student-athletes to compete. DISCLAIMER: THE SUMMARY
More informationEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT A. INTRODUCTION. This case was resolved through the summary disposition process, a cooperative endeavor in which the Committee on Infractions reviews
More informationGuidelines for Representatives of Athletics Interest
NCAA Division III Bylaw 13.02.9 Representative of Athletics Interests or Booster. A "representative of the institution's athletics interests" is an individual who is known (or who should have been known)
More informationBrigham Young University Athletics Compliance Handbook
Brigham Young University Athletics Compliance Handbook Updated: March 2015 Contents Introduction... 4 Compliance Office Personnel... 5 Director of Athletics Compliance... 5 Compliance Coordinators... 5
More informationPractice Exam. PRACTICE EXAM Academic Year: Division: Date: 12/28/2017 Test ID: Page 1
Test D: 2792920 1 A visit to a prospective student-athlete's high school, preparatory school or two-year college, or an evaluation at any site that occurs during a contact period shall constitute a contact
More informationFAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION November 14, 2017
FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division II Committee on Infractions (COI) is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals
More informationPractice Exam. 5 Two coaches engaged in off-campus recruiting activities on the same day use recruiting-person days. A) Zero. B) One. C) Two. D) Four.
Test D: 2792396 1 The institution is organizing its summer men's basketball camp and has called many prospective student-athletes to invite them to the camp. Given the institution made phone calls to prospective
More informationCamp Checklist. any USC logo/design/picture/name to Steve Lopes for approval All Camp Advertisements Compliance Office Two Weeks Prior to Publication
Camp Checklist Completed Item: Submit To: Due : Camp s Fall Within NCAA Rules for Compliance Office Prior to Establishing Camps/Clinics Camp/Clinic s Camp Brochure Compliance Office Two Weeks Prior to
More informationAll athlete agents interested in contacting or representing a student-athlete must be registered with the following:
Purpose This document outlines the Athlete Agent Policy applicable to all student athletes at The Georgia Institute of Technology [hereafter referred to as GT ] in order to comply with NCAA Bylaw 12.3
More informationNCAA Division II Football Recruiting Calendar. June 1, 2016, through May 31, (See NCAA Division II Bylaw for Football Calendar Formula)
NCAA Division II Football June 1, 2016, through May 31, 2017 (See NCAA Division II Bylaw 13.17.3 for Football Calendar Formula) The dates in this calendar reflect the application of Bylaw 13.17.3 at the
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION DECEMBER 20, 2017
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION DECEMBER 20, 2017 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions (COI) is an independent administrative body of the NCAA
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUFF PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION NOVEMBER 5, 2014
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUFF PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION NOVEMBER 5, 2014 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised
More informationCONTACT: David Swank, Chair, NCAA Committee on Infractions VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS REPORT
FOR RELEASE: November 9, 1993, 1 p.m. (Central Time) CONTACT: David Swank, Chair, NCAA Committee on Infractions University of Oklahoma VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS REPORT
More informationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS. CAMPS and CLINICS MANUAL
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS CAMPS and CLINICS MANUAL Table of Contents I. Institutional A. Admission Expenses 1. Free/Reduced Admission 2. Group Discounts B. Advertisement C. Attendance
More informationUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PIACED ON PROBATION
For Release Monday a.m., December 20 Contact: Dave Cawood UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PIACED ON PROBATION MISSION, Kans.--The University of Kentucky has been placed on probation for two years by the National
More informationStudent Manager Agreement
Student Manager Agreement Name: Email: USC ID #: Phone Number: Sport: Please Check Your Status: Undergraduate Student Manager Graduate Student Manager Enrolled Full-Time As an undergraduate or graduate
More informationDepartment of Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Manual
Department of Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Manual A. Recruiting Activities COMPLIANCE Institutional Control Recruiting Recruiting Calendars: Each sport has specific recruiting periods that must be
More informationSJSU Athletics Compliance Office Coaches Education
SJSU Athletics Compliance Office Coaches Education NCAA New Head Coaches Control & Responsibility Model, Violation Structure & Initial Eligibility Standards July 23 & 25, 2013 HEAD COACH CONTROL & New
More informationBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS APPEAL DECISION RELEASED. INDIANAPOLIS The NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee has upheld a
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, MEDIA CONTACT Stacey Osburn Associate Director of Public and Media Relations 317/917-6117 BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS APPEAL DECISION RELEASED INDIANAPOLIS The NCAA
More informationIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (ISUPP) Athletics Ethical Conduct ISUPP 8170 POLICY INFORMATION I. POLICY STATEMENT
IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (ISUPP) Athletics Ethical Conduct ISUPP 8170 POLICY INFORMATION Major Functional Area (MFA): Athletics Policy Title: Athletics Ethical Conduct Responsible
More informationUNDERSTANDING NCAA ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT RULES. A Guide to Promoting and Protecting Academic Integrity
UNDERSTANDING NCAA ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT RULES A Guide to Promoting and Protecting Academic Integrity INTRODUCTION The NCAA has seen a significant increase in academic misconduct infractions in recent years.
More informationUNOFFICIAL VISITATION FORM COMPLIMENTARY ADMISSIONS
Form 1 UNOFFICIAL VISITATION FORM Prospect s Name: Sport: Parent(s)/Legal Guardian Name: Date of Arrival: Transportation Description: Date of Departure: Accompanied by: Lodging: Hotel Dorm Other COMPLIMENTARY
More informationAs Always, Don t Bet on it!
COMPLIANCE NEWS March 21, 2014 March 27, 2014 RECRUITING CALENDER Baseball Men s Basketball Women s Basketball Football Mar 21 Mar 27: Quiet Period Cross Country/Track Women s Volleyball Tip of the Week
More informationSECTION 8: TEAM MANAGEMENT
SECTION 8: TEAM MANAGEMENT ROSTER MANAGEMENT 1. The department has established roster targets for all programs. The men s team targets are maximums and the women s numbers are projected minimums. A listing
More information[THIS REPORT REFLECTS CHANGES MADE TO PENALTY C-9 BY THE COMMITTEE ON MARCH 15, 2013.] OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT February 7, 2013
[THIS REPORT REFLECTS CHANGES MADE TO PENALTY C-9 BY THE COMMITTEE ON MARCH 15, 2013.] OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT A. INTRODUCTION. This case was resolved through the summary disposition
More informationFrequently Asked Questions for Boosters. 1. Q: What is a representative of Texas A&M s athletic interests (commonly known as a booster)?
BOOSTER & PROSPECT CONCEPTS: Frequently Asked Questions for Boosters 1. Q: What is a representative of Texas A&M s athletic interests (commonly known as a booster)? A: A representative of Texas A&M University's
More informationNCAA Division I Bowl Subdivision Football Recruiting Calendar. August 1, 2017, through July 31, 2018
NCAA Division I Bowl Subdivision Football August, 207, through July 3, 208 (See NCAA Division I Bylaw 3.7.4. for Football Calendar Formula) UPDATED: August 30, 207 (a) August 3, 207: Dead Period (b) (c)
More informationNCAA COMPLIANCE AUDIT: ELIGIBILITY NOVEMBER 29, 2017
NCAA COMPLIANCE AUDIT: ELIGIBILITY NOVEMBER 29, 2017 OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT BOX 19112 ARLINGTON, TX 76019-0112 817-272-0150 www.uta.edu/internalaudit UNI VERSITY OF TEXAS ARLING TON OFFICE OF INTERNAL
More informationSECTION 13: COMPLIANCE MANUAL
SECTION 13: COMPLIANCE MANUAL I. INDIVIDUAL COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES As an NCAA member institution, the College of William and Mary shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the NCAA
More informationPractice Exam. 3 During an OFFICIAL visit, a prospective student-athlete may participate in game-day simulation activities. A) True. B) False.
PRACTCE EXAM Test D: 2802124 1 n order for an SAT or ACT score to be used to certify the initial-eligibility of a prospective student-athlete, the score must be provided to the NCAA Eligibility Center
More informationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT JUNE 26, 2013
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT JUNE 26, 2013 I. INTRODUCTION On April 20, 2013, officials from the University of Oregon, 1 (Oregon) including the former head football coach ("former head
More informationWhite Paper on NAIA Conferences Revised March 2013
White Paper on NAIA Conferences Revised March 2013 During the past two years, the Council of Presidents (COP), Conference Commissioners Association (CCA), and other constituent groups have stressed the
More information1:30 p.m. (Central time) NCAA Committee on Infractions University of Oklahoma GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT
FOR RELEASE CONTACT: Thursday, July 31, 1997 David Swank, chair 1:30 p.m. (Central time) NCAA Committee on Infractions University of Oklahoma GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT OVERLAND
More informationAthletics Compliance Operating Manual
Athletics Compliance Operating Manual 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Athletics Compliance Office (ACO)... 7 Athletics Compliance Office... 7 Mission & Vision Statement.... 8 Compliance Plan of Action.. 8 Staff
More informationMarch Rules. Education. Georgia State University Department of Athletics. Olympic Sports March 26 th, 2015
March Rules Olympic Sports March 26 th, 2015 Education Georgia State University Department of Athletics Agenda Recruiting Calendar Financial Aid Rosters NLI & Gambling Reminder Interps Additional Information
More informationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION December 21, 2016
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions (COI) is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals from the Division
More informationHOWARD UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT MAY 20, 2014
HOWARD UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT MAY 20, 2014 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body comprised of individuals from the NCAA Division
More informationThis page left blank intentionally.
This page left blank intentionally. Summary The Camps and Clinics audit was included in the Arizona State University (ASU) annual audit plan for Fiscal Year 2016. This audit is historically completed on
More informationKANSAS ATHLETICS STAFF INVOLVEMENT WITH LOCAL SPORTS CLUB
Local Sports Clubs and CAA Compliance Bylaw 13.11.2.3 KASAS ATHLETICS STAFF IVOLVEMET WITH LOCAL SPORTS CLUB The intent of this guide is to serve as a summary of CAA regulations applicable to local sports
More informationFinally, the former tutor refused to cooperate with the investigation. constituted violations of NCAA ethical conduct legislation.
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT MARCH 12, 2012 A. INTRODUCTION. On October 28, 2011, officials from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and a former assistant
More informationGUIDE FOR CRIMSON TIDE SUPPORTERS
U N I V E R S I T Y O F A L A B A M A A T H L E T I C S C O M P L I A N C E GUIDE FOR CRIMSON TIDE SUPPORTERS @BamaCompliance 1 A LETTER FROM COMPLIANCE Dear Crimson Tide Supporters, We are very grateful
More informationOverview Camps and Clinics
Kristen Matha and Leeland Zeller NCAA 2015 Regional Rules Seminar DIVISION I RECRUITING (CAMPS AND CLINICS) - FOUNDATIONAL Overview Camps and Clinics 1. Timing, Location and Attendance Restrictions of
More informationOverview Camps and Clinics
Division I Recruiting (Camps and Clinics) Foundational Scott Connors and Jenn Samble 2017 NCAA Regional Rules Seminars Overview Camps and Clinics 1. Timing and Location of Institutional Camps/Clinics.
More informationSports Agents and Financial Advisors
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING Sports Agents and Financial Advisors University of North Carolina Department of Athletics RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CAROLINA STUDENT-ATHLETES 2007-2008 INTRODUCTION The
More informationNCAA Division I New Legislation Summary
2016-9 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY AND PROCESS -- DIVISION I LEGISLATIVE PROCESS -- PROCESS FOR AREAS OF AUTONOMY -- SUBMISSION DEADLINES 2016-10 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY AND PROCESS -- DIVISION I LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION December 1, 2017
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions (COI) is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals from
More informationTitle: ATHLETICS PERSONNEL AND RECRUITING -- FOOTBALL RECRUITING MODEL
Division: I Proposal Number: 2016-116 Title: ATHLETICS PERSONNEL AND RECRUITING -- FOOTBALL RECRUITING MODEL Status: Adopted Final Intent: In football, to revise legislation related to camps and clinics;
More informationThe Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data
The Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data Submitted October 15, 2015 The Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act Survey (EADA) was designed to make prospective students and
More informationNCAA RECRUITING TERMS & DEFINITIONS RECRUITING TERMS & DEFINITIONS
NCAA RECRUITING TERMS & DEFINITIONS RECRUITING TERMS & DEFINITIONS PROSPECTIVE STUDENT-ATHLETE You become a prospective student-athlete when: You start ninth-grade classes; or Before your ninth-grade year,
More informationGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION JULY 7, 2016
[July 13, 2015, Erratum: Section V, Penalty No. 8 (vacation of records) of this decision contained an identification error. Penalty No. 8 incorrectly identified student-athlete 3 in place of student-athlete
More informationNCAA RULES EDUCATION Official Visits October 2, 2012
NCAA RULES EDUCATION Official Visits October 2, 2012 OFFICIAL VISIT: DEFINITION NCAA Bylaw: 13.02.16.1 Official Visit : A campus visit to a member institution by a prospective studentathlete financed in
More informationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION MARCH 6, 2015
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION MARCH 6, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals from
More informationRULES EDUCATION SEMINAR
Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Ask Before You Act! 1 RULES EDUCATION SEMINAR November 2016 Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Ask Before You Act! 2 Agenda Hocus Focus Monthly Reminders Student-Athlete Employment
More informationNCAA DIVISION I COACHES (RECRUITING) CERTIFICATION TEST OUTLINE
2018-19 NCAA DIVISION I COACHES (RECRUITING) CERTIFICATION TEST OUTLINE This coaches' certification test outline is intended to serve as a rules-education tool for the conference and the institution, and
More information2017 NCAA Regional Rules Seminars Daily Schedule
MONDAY MORNING 8 8:20 a.m. Chalk Talk for New Attendees 8 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Division I Advanced Track (Invitation Only) 8:30 9:25 a.m. Division I NCAA Bootcamp Foundational 9:30 11:30 a.m. Division I Welcome
More informationNCAA Division I Championship Subdivision Football Recruiting Calendar August 1, 2017, through July 31, 2018
NCAA Division I Championship Subdivision Football August 1, 2017, through July 31, 2018 (See NCAA Division I Bylaw 13.17.4.2 for Football Calendar Formula) (a) August 1-31, 2017: Dead Period (b) September
More informationBoard Agenda Item G.1. Board Agenda Item G.2.
AGENDA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE *10:45 a.m., Friday, ** Room 100, Louisiana Purchase Room Claiborne Conference Center 1201 North Third Street Baton Rouge, Louisiana MEMBERS: Mr. James Carter, Chair
More informationDepartment of Athletics Compliance Manual
Department of Athletics Compliance Manual Georgetown College s responsibility for the conduct of its intercollegiate athletics program includes responsibility for the actions of its staff members and for
More informationOhio State Athletic Compliance Booster Guide
Ohio State Athletic Compliance Booster Guide The Ohio State University is proud to have your loyal support, dedication and enthusiasm for Buckeye Athletics. As we strive for continued excellence, we always
More informationPractice Exam. PRACTICE EXAM Academic Year: Division: Date: 12/11/2017 Test ID: Page 1
1 Which of the following expenses may an outside team provide to a prospective student-athlete? A) Actual and necessary expenses for practice and competition. B) Cash. C) Educational expenses provided
More informationUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION MARCH 27, 2018
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION MARCH 27, 2018 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions (COI) is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised
More informationA Guide for the College-Bound Student Athlete NCAA Division I Recruiting
The following information is provided by the NCAA: A Guide for the College-Bound Student Athlete NCAA Division I Recruiting You become a "prospective student-athlete" when you start ninth-grade classes.
More informationNCAA Compliance-Eligibility Audit
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN OFFICE OF AUDITS & CONSULTING SERVICES NCAA Compliance-Eligibility Audit Report No. 14-04 OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDITS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - PAN AMERICAN 1201 West
More informationNCAA DIVISION I: NEW LEGISLATION 2013 NCAA REGIONAL RULES SEMINAR
NCAA DIVISION I: NEW LEGISLATION 2013 NCAA REGIONAL RULES SEMINAR SESSION OVERVIEW Review of NCAA Division I proposals adopted in the 2012-13 legislative cycle. Best practices. Questions. ATHLETICS PERSONNEL
More informationLOCAL SERVICE BUSINESSES
LOCAL SERVICE BUSINESSES THANK YOU for Your Support of Ohio State Athletics! The Ohio State University is proud to have your loyal support, dedication and enthusiasm for Buckeye Athletics. As we strive
More informationPractice Exam. PRACTICE EXAM Academic Year: Division: Date: 11/21/2017 Test ID: Page 1
1 Any solicitation of a prospective student-athlete or a prospective student-athlete's relatives [or legal guardian(s)] by an institutional staff member or by a representative of the institution's athletics
More informationThe University of Virginia Department of Athletics. Office of Compliance Policy and Procedures Manual. Created 7/1/05 Rev
The University of Virginia Department of Athletics Office of Compliance Policy and Procedures Manual Created 7/1/05 Rev 090717 UVA COMPLIANCE OFFICE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Table of Contents Section
More informationPractice Exam. PRACTICE EXAM Academic Year: Division: Date: 01/18/2018 Test ID: Page 1
1 An institution's basketball camp may ONLY be conducted during the months of June, July and August, or any calendar week (Sunday through Saturday) that includes days of those months. 2 During a two-year
More informationDivision I Women s Basketball Recruiting Calendar. August 11. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat. Quiet period: August Yellow - Quiet period
August Quiet period: August - 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 Yellow - Quiet period September Quiet period: September - 5 Contact period: September 6-30 Women s basketball
More information[THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADJUSTMENT
[THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADJUSTMENT TO THE PROBATIONARY PERIOD RESULTING FROM THE DECISION OF THE NCAA DIVISION I INFRACTIONS APPEALS COMMITTEE] ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT
More informationPolicies and Procedures Recruiting Regulations
Policies and Procedures 40.10.7 Recruiting Regulations Policy Number: 40.10.7 Name: Recruiting Regulations Origin: Ad Hoc Working Group Approved: December 2015 Approval Process: Board of Directors Revision
More informationKNOW THE RULES. New Legislation
Follow us on Twitter! @GaelsCompliance Saint Mary s College Coaches & Athletic Administration Newsletter February 2015 IMPORTANT DATES February 1 (11:59p.m.PST) SMC Admissions Deadline for Fall 2015 enrollees
More information1 p.m. (Central time) NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions University of Iowa UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT
FOR RELEASE CONTACT: Tuesday, Bonnie Slatton, acting chair 1 p.m. (Central time) NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions University of Iowa UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT OVERLAND
More informationOverview DIVISION I ATHLETICS PERSONNEL - ADVANCED 7/6/2015. NCAA Bylaw Undergraduate Student Assistant Coach
7/6/ Kristen Matha and Eric Mayes NCAA Regional Rules Seminar DIVISION I ATHLETICS PERSONNEL - ADVANCED Overview 1. Undergraduate Student es. 2. Volunteer es. 3. Scouting of Opponents. 4. Countable es.
More information5. An institution shall not involve a third party or representative of athletics interest in recruiting a prospective student-athlete.
NCAA Working Group on Collegiate Model -- Rules Discussion Document -- NCAA Bylaw 13 NCAA Bylaw 13 Guiding Statements/Principles. 1. The recruitment process shall balance the interests of prospective student-athletes,
More informationWayne State College Athletic Department Financial Procedures Handbook
Wayne State College Athletic Department Financial Procedures Handbook Original Issue Date August 22, 2011 First Revision October 27, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 TRAVEL 1.1 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL 1.2 TEAM TRAVEL
More informationInitial Athletics Grant-in-Aid Offers to Prospective Student-Athletes
Initial Athletics Grant-in-Aid Offers to Prospective Student-Athletes POLICIES Athletics grants-in-aid can only be offered to students for one year at a time. Coaches may state that it is Boston College
More informationCamps and Clinics. Agenda. Starting Point 6/30/2016. Events involving prospective studentathletes hosted on an institution s campus.
Camps and Clinics Presented By Maureen Harty Agenda Events involving prospective studentathletes hosted on an institution s campus. Coach involvement with events involving prospective student-athletes.
More informationPractice Exam. PRACTICE EXAM Academic Year: Division: Date: 11/25/2017 Test ID: Page 1
PRACTCE EXAM Test D: 2784149 1 A prospective student-athlete purchased an airline ticket to arrive at an airport that is not the nearest major airport because it was less expensive. The institution may
More informationPractice Exam. PRACTICE EXAM Academic Year: Division: Date: 04/05/2018 Test ID: Page 1
1 A coach may be involved as a participant or in instructional coaching activities in the same sport for a local sports club or organization located in the institution's home community in which all prospective
More informationUnit for Assessment: Men's Tennis, includes equipment center, facilities and weight room
Report Submission - ID: 17Admin90 Author(s): Jean Gee Unit of Analysis ID Number: 07 Sector: Athletics Division : Men's Tennis Unit for Assessment: Men's Tennis, includes equipment center, facilities and
More informationDIVISION I MANUAL. January
DIVISION I MANUAL January 2015-16 THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 6222 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6222 317/917-6222 ncaa.org July 2015 [ISSN 1093-3174] Text Prepared By: NCAA Academic
More informationNCAA DIVISION I COACHES OFF CAMPUS RECRUITING GUIDE SPORTS OTHER THAN FOOTBALL AND BASKETBALL Effective August 1, 2011
NCAA DIVISION I COACHES OFF CAMPUS RECRUITING GUIDE SPORTS OTHER THAN FOOTBALL AND BASKETBALL Effective August 1, 2011 Freshman/Sophomore Junior Senior Two-Year College Prospects Four-Year College Prospects
More informationRECRUITING HANDOUT FOR THE COLLEGE BOUND STUDENT-ATHLETE
RECRUITING HANDOUT FOR THE COLLEGE BOUND STUDENT-ATHLETE RECRUITING RULES: These rules are to be followed by the student-athletes, their parents, as well as the college coaches and their respective schools.
More informationNCAA GRADUATION RATES REPORT SIGNATURE FORM. The report was found to be correct, as provided by the NCAA.
NCAA GRADUATION RATES REPORT SIGNATURE FORM After review of the online Graduation Rates Report, the chancellor or president must sign the appropriate space on this form, which must be uploaded to the Academic
More informationNCAA DIVISION I COACHES (RECRUITING) CERTIFICATION TEST. Coaches (Recruiting) CertificationTest Outline
2014-15 NCAA DIVISION I COACHES (RECRUITING) CERTIFICATION TEST Coaches (Recruiting) CertificationTest Outline This coaches certification test outline is intended to serve as a rules-education tool for
More informationSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY PARKING REGULATIONS
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY PARKING REGULATIONS The availability of sufficient parking at San Diego State University (SDSU) has significant impact on the quality of life of campus community members. The
More information